Why the "Bitter Jury" Argument Sucks in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

Why the "Bitter Jury" Argument Sucks

Started By	Comment
RedXIII13	Why the "Bitter Jury" Argument Sucks	Lead	[-]
Posts: 36 (12/27/09 06:12 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Fat free Internet Remove this ad In terms of Samoa, the use of the term "bitter jury" for Russhole's lost is misplaced. If the jury had anyone to be pissed at it, it'd be Natalie. Who would you feel more "betrayed" by? A guy who is a jerk and would be completely expected to vote you out or a girl who befriended you to vote you out later? Essentially, the Jury would be pissier at Natalie if they were bitter, as Natalie befriended them and made actual alliances with some of them as some interviews have shown us, so it would be Natalie in which the jury would have been bitter against in this scenario.
TroubleInTampa		#1	[-]
Posts: 6334 (12/27/09 07:07 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I don't recall Natalie making any alliance with any any Galu. Did I miss something?
Sshaaz		#2	[-]
Posts: 783 (12/27/09 07:08 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Yeah, there have been some strange re-writes to this show lately
JasonSiskaRulz		#3	[-]
Posts: 98 (12/27/09 07:28 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Erik voted for Natalie because she was weak, and didn't do anything. He said so.
SkyDreamer		#4	[-]
Posts: 613 (12/27/09 08:21 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	All of Russell's fans are living under the illusion that he is "the best player ever". Therefore they can't acknowledge the fact that Natalie won because the jury thought she deserved it more, and not because they voted against Russell.
PrettyGoodYear1988		#5	[-]
Posts: 3111 (12/27/09 08:21 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Saying that Natalie made side alliances with Galu members is a bit much. She bonded strongly with the women and Brett, but simply because you like someone, doesn't mean that there isn't the understanding that they are on the opposite side as you. That being said, I think calling Galu bitter is ridiculous. With the exception of John and Shambo, none of them ever made a legitimate deal with any Foa Foa member. Thus, they can't complain about being backstabbed. Galu can be bitter at John and Shambo for turning on them, but they can't really be bitter against the other team trying to eliminate them, since that's kind of the point.
Sshaaz		#6	[-]
Posts: 790 (12/27/09 08:27 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Their bitterness is more directed at themselves...worst game performance in Survivor history. So, yeah, they look very bitter, and rightfully so.
ttll		#7	[-]
Posts: 23 (12/27/09 08:59 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	It's not about being bitter.It's about one's personality which either you respect or dislike.
JasonSiskaRulz		#8	[-]
Posts: 105 (12/27/09 09:04 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SkyDreamer wrote: All of Russell's fans are living under the illusion that he is "the best player ever". Therefore they can't acknowledge the fact that Natalie won because the jury thought she deserved it more, and not because they voted against Russell. Even Laura called him the best player out here, you dipshit. She also said that Natalie did jack shit the entire game. Kelly and Erik said the same thing. BTW, I don't know about you, but I am pumped for another season of Russ kicking ass, and taking names!
Apprentice Talker		#9	[-]
Posts: 11844 (12/27/09 09:17 AM) WRP Official Spokesperson Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Russell is a piece of crap and receiving two fucking votes.
NlGHTCRAWLER		#10	[-]
Posts: 23175 (12/27/09 09:27 AM) >: \| Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Fat free Internet Remove this ad RedXIII13 wrote: In terms of Samoa, the use of the term "bitter jury" for Russhole's lost is misplaced. If the jury had anyone to be pissed at it, it'd be Natalie. Who would you feel more "betrayed" by? A guy who is a jerk and would be completely expected to vote you out or a girl who befriended you to vote you out later? Essentially, the Jury would be pissier at Natalie if they were bitter, as Natalie befriended them and made actual alliances with some of them as some interviews have shown us, so it would be Natalie in which the jury would have been bitter against in this scenario. Go to hell.
RichPrick		#11	[-]
Posts: 632 (12/27/09 09:31 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	JasonSiskaRulz wrote: SkyDreamer wrote: All of Russell's fans are living under the illusion that he is "the best player ever". Therefore they can't acknowledge the fact that Natalie won because the jury thought she deserved it more, and not because they voted against Russell. Even Laura called him the best player out here, you dipshit. She also said that Natalie did jack shit the entire game. Kelly and Erik said the same thing. BTW, I don't know about you, but I am pumped for another season of Russ kicking ass, and taking names! This
varnish255		#12	[-]
Posts: 321 (12/27/09 12:05 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Bitter juries suck ass. Having been at the shit end of a jury before who admitted to voting for the worst I can say that Survivor is an idiotic game of luck.
Oowatanite		#13	[-]
Posts: 9948 (12/27/09 12:12 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Apprentice Talker wrote: Russell is a piece of crap and receiving two fucking votes. Best post in the thread.
Surfing Hippo in Trouble		#14	[-]
Posts: 2019 (12/27/09 12:42 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	If by some miraculous turn of events, Laura, Monica, and Natalie had been in the F3 and Laura and Monica had been the ones that had gotten him out and had played an absolutely brilliant game. Do you think Russell would vote for one of them? No, he would vote for Natalie. Russell's pissed because he was on the other side. If he was in the jury's shoes he would've done the same thing.
River50		#15	[-]
Posts: 587 (12/27/09 12:54 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This jury voted based on morality and ethics, not bitterness.
Jane Drama		#16	[-]
Posts: 49 (12/27/09 01:17 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The jury tried to send him home and it backfired, they can't help but be bitter. Russell was such a terrible person yet Natalie had no problem following him every step of the way. He takes all the blame, she looks like an angel. The hate for Russell was so much they would have taken anybody else.
elizao610		#17	[-]
Posts: 37 (12/27/09 01:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	JasonSiskaRulz wrote: SkyDreamer wrote: All of Russell's fans are living under the illusion that he is "the best player ever". Therefore they can't acknowledge the fact that Natalie won because the jury thought she deserved it more, and not because they voted against Russell. Even Laura called him the best player out here, you dipshit. She also said that Natalie did jack shit the entire game. Kelly and Erik said the same thing. kicking ass, an BTW, I don't know about you, but I am pumped for another season of Russel kicking ass and taking names. Laura did call him the best player, OUT THERE! He is far off from being the best player ever, though. He played a HORRIBLE social game. He banked so much on the mental and strategy part of the game and only put a little effort in the social and physical. Natalie played a good game, but through a different perspective. She made everyone like her while showing she was not gonna put up a fight! She was someone who appealed to the people who wanted to win, because she would be easy to beat in challenges and she is not playing any game. She showed she could strategize when she orchestrated Erik's boot. Even though that was the only move she made, she made friendships with the others, while Russell was being an asshole to them. In turn they were equally deserving, and this jury decided they would look at social game instead of mental.
forsbergacct2000		#18	[-]
Posts: 155 (12/27/09 01:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	None of this matters. Per the rules of the game, the jury can vote for whomever they please among the finalists. Everyone playing the game knows this. Plenty of people have dominated the "voting out" part of the game and lost the final vote. This is not a novel occurence and should not have been a surprise possibility for Russell. Maybe he will watch his mouth and behavior in general next time.
Paparazzi		#19	[-]
Posts: 2 (12/28/09 01:58 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Yeah, all of Foa Foa voted for all of Galu, and it's not like they were aligned, they were just trying to get ahead. It wasn't a bitter jury, it was just a jury that thought Natalie played better. I don't know why people can't fathom this...
JPOz		#20	[-]
Posts: 719 (12/28/09 02:44 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Fat free Internet Remove this ad Paparazzi wrote: Yeah, all of Foa Foa voted for all of Galu, and it's not like they were aligned, they were just trying to get ahead. It wasn't a bitter jury, it was just a jury that thought Natalie played better. I don't know why people can't fathom this... Because some people cannot accept that everyone has a right to say no. And that jurors who decided NO to Russell and YES to Natalie had a right to make that decision. Easier to blame the jury as bitter, and attack them and Natalie, than admit Russell's shortcomings cost him the game because some are unwilling to admit there were shortcomings in his game.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Why the "Bitter Jury" Argument Sucks

Why the "Bitter Jury" Argument Sucks