Where did Mick go wrong game wise(Imo Nowhere) in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

Where did Mick go wrong game wise(Imo Nowhere)

Started By	Comment
FreeCreditReportDotCom	Where did Mick go wrong game wise(Imo Nowhere)	Lead	[-]
Posts: 14 (12/31/09 01:28 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad I know this forum has spent the last few weeks with Natalie and Russell fans arguing about who is the better player but why is Mick not in the discussion. He won twice as many Immunities as both of them combined,ruffled no feathers and made the gay guy ask him out on a date. Was the jury just a bit too bitter because he exemplified everything they wish they could be .( Rich,Athletic,Doctor,Good Looking,Nice Abs and a Pleasant Personality) The Producers should have edited him better because they missed out on a Cirie or Boston Rob type storyline with him.
SleepTight		#1	[-]
Posts: 574 (12/31/09 01:36 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This has been said before. The Jury was undecided between Natalie or Mick. (Kelly, Brett, Monica and Dave anyway) But Erik's speech was basically what made them lean towards Natalie. also, Mick didn't 'woah' anyone with his Jury performance. apparently Natalie's did. Last Edited By: SleepTight 12/31/09 01:38 PM. Edited 1 times.
NlGHTCRAWLER		#2	[-]
Posts: 23209 (12/31/09 01:39 PM) >: \| Reply Quote More Recent Posts	THREAD OF THE YEAR!!!!!
Shred		#3	[-]
Posts: 1025 (12/31/09 01:51 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SleepTight wrote: This has been said before. The Jury was undecided between Natalie or Mick. (Kelly, Brett, Monica and Dave anyway) But Erik's speech was basically what made them lean towards Natalie. also, Mick didn't 'woah' anyone with his Jury performance. apparently Natalie's did. Actually Brett was always voting Natalie and was a major reason why she won :) just sayin. But Erik's speech <3 This thread sucks. Mick being compared to Cirie and Boston Rob that is a first
SuperJude		#4	[-]
Posts: 16610 (12/31/09 01:52 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Whatever, he won the Sucks award for Hottest Male, which is much more important. I think his pasty skin and crooked smile ruined his chances. -SJ™
NlGHTCRAWLER		#5	[-]
Posts: 23210 (12/31/09 01:56 PM) >: \| Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SuperJude wrote: Whatever, he won the Sucks award for Hottest Male, which is much more important. I think his pasty skin and crooked smile ruined his chances. -SJ™ Mick does not look good.
TroubleInTampa		#6	[-]
Posts: 6389 (12/31/09 02:00 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	As the self proclaimed Sucks spokeswoman for the fair-skinned, I must state that THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH PASTY SKIN! Mick was simply boring. Sorry.
cfcid.wpninjas		#7	[-]
Posts: 7 (12/31/09 02:04 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The issue was that Mick has a cock and that the whole jury, including Dave Ball, has penis-envy.
Axie.rsfd		#8	[-]
Posts: 327 (12/31/09 02:18 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SuperJude wrote: Whatever, he won the Sucks award for Hottest Male, which is much more important. I think his pasty skin and crooked smile ruined his chances. -SJ™ If anything, those things should outweigh the fact that his FTC performance was craptastic. Mick's pasty skin and crooked smile <3 it certainly outweighs the fact that he did absolutely nothing on the season. Last Edited By: Axie 12/31/09 03:32 PM. Edited 2 times.
gretchensucks		#9	[-]
Posts: 982 (12/31/09 02:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	While quite fuckable, he needs a personality transplant. End of story.
MonkeeSpanker		#10	[-]
Posts: 1251 (12/31/09 02:36 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad Typical jury and Sucksters, no love for a straight white male.
Fart Party		#11	[-]
Posts: 375 (12/31/09 02:54 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	He played the same game as those other 2 Foa Foa followers. There's never going to be a good reason for any of them to have won, because riding coattails is only a way to look good in front of a retarded jury.
JPOz		#12	[-]
Posts: 753 (12/31/09 02:57 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	You remember just after the merge both he and Jaison complained the Galu pretty much stayed to themselves....Mick treated them the same way...so when he needed their vote none of them had any attachment to him, either strategically or socially. But seriously, he went wrong when he let the casting assistant talk him into applying...you cannot play this game as Mr. Nice Guy and let other people own both the strategic and social aspects and expect a jury to vote for you. It seems his biggest concern was he didn't want to do something that would tarnish his reputation when he got back to real life; anyone who plays that way handicaps themself into losing.
little goomba		#13	[-]
Posts: 27 (12/31/09 03:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	he should have made bigger moves... but the jury did not like bigger moves...so i suppose he never was going to win... ever
srvivrfreakevelrich		#14	[-]
Posts: 2957 (12/31/09 07:21 PM) Admin Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Mick didnt do anything wrong gamewise because he didnt do anything gamewise.
Miles Edgeworth		#15	[-]
Posts: 3109 (12/31/09 07:27 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	he had a penis and laura and all her bitches didnt like that.
survivorfan202		#16	[-]
Posts: 19 (12/31/09 10:13 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The flaw with the Survivor jury is they dont have any set requirements. Challenge wins should be counted as extra votes.
Axie.rsfd		#17	[-]
Posts: 335 (12/31/09 10:23 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	survivorfan202 wrote: The flaw with the Survivor jury is they dont have any set requirements. Challenge wins should be counted as extra votes. x 999999 Survivor may be about strategy, about socializing, about actual survival... but it's NOT about the challenges.
bryanpasa		#18	[-]
Posts: 3077 (01/01/10 01:53 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Axie wrote: survivorfan202 wrote: The flaw with the Survivor jury is they dont have any set requirements. Challenge wins should be counted as extra votes. x 999999 Survivor may be about strategy, about socializing, about actual survival... but it's NOT about the challenges. Then Brett should have won Mick has a delusional entitlement =o In terms of leadership, Swan > Trimming. So that made him look like sucky. Then Natalie has those bonds with Charlie's Angels + 9O21O Clique....made her win.
Kitty Pryde1		#19	[-]
Posts: 11215 (01/01/10 01:56 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	So in other words... Instead of the 7-2-0 vote we got, if we take into account challenge wins... 7-3-1. Good idea random guy who's an idiot.
menelaus		#20	[-]
Posts: 497 (01/01/10 03:41 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad He lost because Natalie had more friends. In just about every season the person most liked by the jury has won. Even in seasons where villains won, they were still more liked than their opponents, although it was close in China in terms of popularity. This is absolutely nothing new. People would rather give 1 million dollars to someone that they like. Last Edited By: menelaus 01/01/10 04:47 AM. Edited 1 times.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Where did Mick go wrong game wise(Imo Nowhere)

Where did Mick go wrong game wise(Imo Nowhere)