Jeff: "If you're not happy with this group, you're not a Survivor fan!" in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

Jeff: "If you're not happy with this group, you're not a Survivor fan!"

Started By	Comment
Kirblar		#41	[-]
Posts: 8676 (01/07/10 10:28 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Humpty-Dumpty was pushed! Remove this ad SirCrocodilep wrote: SwineForkbeard wrote: If the rumors about Jeff's power struggle with Lynne Spillman over casting this season are true, he's not much of a Survivor fan himself. I heard he was threatening to walk. Please explains (Danielle being cast)
AnomyBC		#42	[-]
Posts: 4977 (01/07/10 10:35 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them.
Shred		#43	[-]
Posts: 1240 (01/07/10 10:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	AnomyBC wrote: Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them. Jerri is an iconic female villain in reality tv and influential as hell. Jerri deserves that spot in a villain season. No question.
River50		#44	[-]
Posts: 733 (01/07/10 10:44 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Overall, I like the cast, mainly because I never thought I'd see Sandra again. Plus Cirie and Courtney are back, which makes me very happy. The rest of the cast, I'm mostly fine with except for: Rupert. Too much Rupert a second time, we don't need a third go with him. His bit is so old and predictable now, and I actually liked him and thought he was integral to PI. I can't think of an over the top replacement for him though. Candice. The main WTF for me. Replace her with Natalie from Samoa if you want a blond hero. Danielle. Replace her with Natalie from FvF.
SirCrocodilep		#45	[-]
Posts: 577 (01/07/10 10:45 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Kirblar wrote: SirCrocodilep wrote: SwineForkbeard wrote: If the rumors about Jeff's power struggle with Lynne Spillman over casting this season are true, he's not much of a Survivor fan himself. I heard he was threatening to walk. Please explains (Danielle being cast) Is that confirm?
AnomyBC		#46	[-]
Posts: 4978 (01/07/10 10:48 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them. Jerri is an iconic female villain in reality tv and influential as hell. Jerri deserves that spot in a villain season. No question. But what exactly did Jerri ever do that was villainous? She was kind of annoying and bitchy, but that doesn't qualify someone as being a villain in my mind.
Mateui		#47	[-]
Posts: 2781 (01/07/10 10:49 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I'm surprised Burton and Terry (especially with Jeff's hardon for him) weren't cast. There are actually quite a few people they could have gotten that would have been better that what they chose.
Shred		#48	[-]
Posts: 1244 (01/07/10 10:52 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	AnomyBC wrote: Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them. Jerri is an iconic female villain in reality tv and influential as hell. Jerri deserves that spot in a villain season. No question. But what exactly did Jerri ever do that was villainous? She was kind of annoying and bitchy, but that doesn't qualify someone as being a villain in my mind. I always loved Jerri, but she was everywhere when Australia was out and everyone hated her. She was the one who started the female villains in reality tv. So how can you not have her on a villain season when all the other female villains were modeled after you.
SurvivorArctic		#49	[-]
Posts: 23839 (01/07/10 10:53 PM) Not a team player Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This cast doesn't just suck, it fucking sucks. Most of them I want dead. And by most I mean 99%. Fuck Jeff. Fuck Survivor. Fuck Burnett. Fuck CBS.
Cyberball2072		#50	[-]
Posts: 704 (01/07/10 10:54 PM) I love ShiiAnn Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Humpty-Dumpty was pushed! Remove this ad Jerri is the living embodiment of Survivor Villainess. I agree that Danielle really does not deserve to be there. Sugar should have been a villain IMHO. Corrine and Natalie were viable alternatives. 50/50 on Tyson- unless Lex (s3) turned it down.
blistering		#51	[-]
Posts: 7116 (01/07/10 10:58 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Fuck Probst. Fuck Probst dead. And once more for all the fucking threepeats.
River50		#52	[-]
Posts: 735 (01/07/10 11:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SurvivorArctic wrote: This cast doesn't just suck, it fucking sucks. Most of them I want dead. And by most I mean 99%. Fuck Jeff. Fuck Survivor. Fuck Burnett. Fuck CBS. SA, aren't you just a little bit looking forward to having Sandra and Coach on the same tribe?
bensylarlocke		#53	[-]
Posts: 142 (01/07/10 11:09 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I am sorry but no natalie fan vs favorites. no corrine from gabon, no terry from exile island, that just sucks. Candice deserves to be on the hero tribe for what? Betraying Yul. ozzy, sundra, and becky? I guess those 4 were so fucking boring on television that makes candice a hero?
RobM fanatic x		#54	[-]
Posts: 4 (01/07/10 11:10 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I signed up here thinking this was a Survivor fansite/message board and that the name of the forum was just a joke. Apparently I was wrong. "Jeff is the worst host ever." "Jeff's a suck up to buff guys." "Jeff sucks." "Fuck Survivor." "This theme fucking sucks." Okay.
AnomyBC		#55	[-]
Posts: 4980 (01/07/10 11:11 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them. Jerri is an iconic female villain in reality tv and influential as hell. Jerri deserves that spot in a villain season. No question. But what exactly did Jerri ever do that was villainous? She was kind of annoying and bitchy, but that doesn't qualify someone as being a villain in my mind. I always loved Jerri, but she was everywhere when Australia was out and everyone hated her. She was the one who started the female villains in reality tv. So how can you not have her on a villain season when all the other female villains were modeled after you. That's ridiculous. Jerri didn't do anything worth being modeled after. She didn't do much of anything at all. I think calling her a female villain is an insult to real female villains like Natalie and Corinne. To be a villain you need to be evil and cutthroat. You need to hate the other contestants and want to see them humiliated. You need to be willing to do anything, and betray anyone, to win. None of those things were true of Jerri. She was just annoying and bitchy. That's not a real villain in my mind. And plus she was completely forgettable on ASS. She was probably the least memorable person that season besides Tina. Did we really need to bring her back again after that?
Shred		#56	[-]
Posts: 1249 (01/07/10 11:11 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	RobM fanatic x wrote: I signed up here thinking this was a Survivor fansite/message board and that the name of the forum was just a joke. Apparently I was wrong. "Jeff is the worst host ever." "Jeff's a suck up to buff guys." "Jeff sucks." Okay. Boston Rob avatar <3
RobM fanatic x	^ :	#57	[-]
Posts: 5 (01/07/10 11:12 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	^ :D <3 Favorite EVAH :)
Phuz1		#58	[-]
Posts: 4977 (01/07/10 11:14 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	blistering wrote: Fuck Probst. Fuck Probst dead. And once more for all the fucking threepeats. blistering <3 <3 <3 Probst can go douche with a volcano. If he thinks this is what we want to see in a season of Survivor, then clearly he needs to get his mouth off EPMB's cock and take a look around. Instead of Heroes vs. Villains, this should be called Douchebags vs. Famewhores. If I were a stronger person, I'd just stop watching. But unlike some delusional assbags who leave and come back like dogs to eat their vomit, I'm not going to make any statements that I'm not prepared to back up with actions.
WylDawg		#59	[-]
Posts: 21762 (01/07/10 11:16 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	If I were a stronger person, I'd just stop watching. But unlike some delusional assbags who leave and come back like dogs to eat their vomit, I'm not going to make any statements that I'm not prepared to back up with actions. See? If everyone who bitches about the show added a statement like that at the end, then i wouldn't mind.
Shred		#60	[-]
Posts: 1251 (01/07/10 11:20 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Humpty-Dumpty was pushed! Remove this ad AnomyBC wrote: Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Shred wrote: AnomyBC wrote: Bowie wrote: The cast doesn't suck. The cast is fine. The theme sucks. There are only 6-7 true clearcut villains and heroes in the entire nineteen season history (Colby, Jerri, Rob, Fairplay, Rupert, Randy, Russell). That's why some of the choices suck. I have the exact opposite point of view. I think the theme is great---I've even suggested that they should have a Heroes vs. Villains season in the past---but the casting could have definitely been a little bit better. And there have been far more clear-cut heroes and villains than just 6 or 7, and I'm not even sure that I would include Colby and Jerri among them. Jerri is an iconic female villain in reality tv and influential as hell. Jerri deserves that spot in a villain season. No question. But what exactly did Jerri ever do that was villainous? She was kind of annoying and bitchy, but that doesn't qualify someone as being a villain in my mind. I always loved Jerri, but she was everywhere when Australia was out and everyone hated her. She was the one who started the female villains in reality tv. So how can you not have her on a villain season when all the other female villains were modeled after you. That's ridiculous. Jerri didn't do anything worth being modeled after. She didn't do much of anything at all. I think calling her a female villain is an insult to real female villains like Natalie and Corinne. To be a villain you need to be evil and cutthroat. You need to hate the other contestants and want to see them humiliated. You need to be willing to do anything, and betray anyone, to win. None of those things were true of Jerri. She was just annoying and bitchy. That's not a real villain in my mind. And plus she was completely forgettable on ASS. She was probably the least memorable person that season besides Tina. Did we really need to bring her back again after that? Were you there for Australia? Jerri is one of the biggest names this show has. Everyone knew Jerri back in 2001, she was a household name and people counted down to her boot. Corinne a real villain ? She was dull Jerri already said she is bringing Australia Jerri back, she tried to be nice in All Star and was still very cool in that season and memorable in her own way. Jerri deserves her call back and would deserve a 4th one.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Jeff: "If you're not happy with this group, you're not a Survivor fan!"