1) The F6 will contain an E, an F, an M, and some kids. (It has 15 of 19 seasons)
CORRECT.
2) F4 will not contain two people with the same role. (It has not 14 of 19)
CORRECT.
3) There will not be 2 Fs or 2Ms in the F6 (There has not been in 17 of 19). (In the odd situation where there are two Ms or two Fs, one will be a failed M or F.)
CORRECT.
4) The F2 will not be two dads nor two moms. (The F2 has never been two dads nor two moms.)
CORRECT.
5) The F2 generally will not be two kids. (The F2 have been two kids only 5 of 18) However, in the rare case the F2 is two kids, at least one will be an "unusual" child with strong "adult" (leader) tendencies.
CORRECT.
6) The winner will not be E. (The winner has never been an E.)
CORRECT. (and we always knew it although we feared it would fail us this season--ah we of little faith!)
7) If a parent is in the F2 with a non-parent, the parent will win. (7 times parent-nonparent has been in F2; 6 times the parent has won... this was an F3)
INDETERMINATE (this was an F3), but the D won over the F and E in the F3. Would the F2 have been Natalie and Russell?
************
I think the point we began to make before the merge is worth repeating again and again...those with ill-defined or confused roles have less chance of winning. Of the F6, the most clearly defined roles were the kids' roles, which we commented upon earlier, as well.
How disgusted and enraged Russell looked when he lost. Of course, it would never occur to him that there might be something valuable to the jury other than strategy, because that is all he has and all he is.
Great job, people! Looking forward to heroes and villians!








