
New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OzzyBrett222 |
|||
|
Bad for him, but great entertainment for us viewers who get to watch him dominate the game. As he will do once again in S20.
Last Edited By: OzzyBrett222
01/12/10 07:41 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
craig |
|||
He would not have won over any of the 20 juries with his "style". We haven't heard half of what went on.I bet Russell could beat someone like Clay or Lill or Twila head to head. They were really good goats, and their opponents could get away with a lot and still win. And he's WAY better a social player than Shane, Penner, or Coach, who couldn't ever hold an alliance together. But Natalie wasn't a good goat. If he can't handle her, he doesn't stand much chance against Parv and Sandra. |
|||
LibrasAbandonedChild1 |
|||
|
What's with all the Sandra hate in this thread? Some people are such fucking morons.
Her strategy was absolutely a legitimiate one. Once Christa was gone, she had NO true allies left and her "as long as it isn't me" strategy
was actually very effective and look, she won. Just because she didn't hog the camera 95% of the time like that piece of shit Russhole, and didn't
pull HII's out of her ass, doesn't mean she wasn't a good player. |
|||
spragenspelt |
|||
|
Let's keep this simple...Sandra (& Parvati) > Russell because they, you know, won. And didn't need to be saved by a HII...for some reason I
doubt Sandra will need to use one to stay in the game this time either.
|
|||
Ichiro20 |
|||
spragenspelt wrote: Because she's SO FUCKING WEAK PHYSICALLY. That'd be the same as saying "I doubt Amber will need to use one to say in the game". |
|||
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8302 (01/12/10 08:44 PM) Registered user |
Ichiro20 wrote:Um no, explain why Cirie gets idoled then. |
||
Ichiro20 |
|||
|
Cirie is a much more aggressive player than Sandra (Sandra is when she feels in danger of being voted out, but otherwise she just lays UTR). Plus Cirie almost
won TWICE in her past seasons.
Obviously Sandra would be targeted much earlier if she came back for a 3rd time, now that she will (probably) be a 2 time winner. But even still the bottom line her style of gameplay is not aggressive. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
|
Fuck all of the Sandra like haters. I didn't think it was like possible to hate Sandra, shes so like lovable.
|
|||
BtvsVamp |
|||
|
I don't think you know what UTR means. Sandra is probably one of the most outspoken and loud mouth players Survivor has ever had.
That's like saying Parvati is UTR because she built alliances and took out who she needed to. Huh? |
|||
BrianShaw23 |
|||
|
I'm not crazy about Sandra because of her big mouth, she's ok for me though I don't hate her. I'm interested to see how she plays... probably
is going to ride Russell/Parvati's coattails, seems like the way to win Survivor nowdays. Such a shame.
|
|||
LSiani |
|||
BrianShaw23 wrote:You're "prediction" posts are actually like pissing me off. Russell isn't that great. He let the idols like lead him through. He really wasn't that great. And his social game was like horrible. Absolutely horrible. He deserved no votes, because he was just a bad player in like a very important aspect. He was really stupid at the biggest part. He like forgot. He never should've made it that far, and he like shouldn't again. The only good thing is seeing him actually go into tears at the reunion when he like loses! |
|||
OzzyBrett222 |
|||
|
What's with all the "likes"? Are you functionally retarded?
Oh right, I forgot, you're a Parvati fan. I answered my own question. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
OzzyBrett222 wrote: Sorry, I type it like I'm saying it. I happen to say "like" a lot - And Parvati >>> Russell. And yeah, I'm the retarded one... |
|||
BrianShaw23 |
|||
LSiani wrote: Omfg, you don't make the Final 3 with a horrible social game. His social game was average, they are all living together out there, I'm sure everyone is going to piss each other off. And HIIs are a huge part of the game, doesn't matter if they helped him get through, he was crafty, clever and devious, he did whatever he had to to make it to the end. Russell was the mastermind, the work horse and he deserved the win. Just because Natalie was in a fortunate position of not having to do shit and just sit around and pretend to like everyone doesn't mean she deserves to have won over Russell. The Galu Jury were a shit Jury and a shit tribe, probably the worst in history. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
BrianShaw23 wrote:HII like don't matter! They're rigged anyway. He wasn't very clever. Natalie played like the better game. She knew how to win. Russell like knew nothing! He didn't know how to win. The 2 like biggest idiots on Galu voted Russell - is that like a coincidence? The only like retarded Galu who did vote Natalie was Brett. Russell didn't play that well. He would like be the worst winner. Many people would hate the season like even more! |
|||
RussellHFan |
|||
|
How can anyone take you seriously when you say like every other word? You're obviously an uneducated child who knows nothing about Survivor. How do HII
not matter, that's called thinking outside the box, which is obviously something you could never do. Talk to me when you like go on Survivor and like play
a better game than like that Russell guy who like dominated like everybody, and was like the victim of like a butt-hurt jury.
|
|||
Paparazzi |
|||
Omfg, you don't make the Final 3 with a horrible social game. His social game was average, they are all living together out there, I'm sure everyone is going to piss each other off. And HIIs are a huge part of the game, doesn't matter if they helped him get through, he was crafty, clever and devious, he did whatever he had to to make it to the end. Russell was the mastermind, the work horse and he deserved the win. Just because Natalie was in a fortunate position of not having to do shit and just sit around and pretend to like everyone doesn't mean she deserves to have won over Russell. The Galu Jury were a shit Jury and a shit tribe, probably the worst in history. Of course you can make the Final 3 with a poor social game, if your alliance sees you as a big goat. The jury vote has always been a part of Survivor, and they have always voted with whatever criteria they like. There has never been a rule that you have to find and use lots of hidden immunity idols, or play very aggressively to win. Natalie's strategy was totally legitimate. She won because of observance, she obvserved who she was playing with, and realized the best way for her to win. Russell pushed and shoved and acted like an asshole. In the end, Natalie's strategy got her the win, and Russell's did not. She understood the game much better than Russell did. There is no "deserving" in Survivor, because there isn't a "right" way to play the game. The most deserving person is the one who effectively uses their strategy to win. This has always been the case, it's not a new phenomenon. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
RussellHFan wrote:That was a fucked up thing to say. I'm not a child, or uneducated. HII this season were like rigged, and their like stupid add-ons to Survivor. Russell like was aggressive, but he was like socially retarded. His social game like bit him in the ass, which he deserved. If you don't think about the end, you're like retarded. Russell played retardedly in one important aspect. And don't test my intelligence. |
|||
BrianShaw23 |
|||
RussellHFan wrote: I know seriously... she talks like she's 13 years old |
|||
Paparazzi |
|||
|
As much as this person's use of the word "like" weirds me out, they're absolutely right. And they clearly understand the game better than
either of you Russell-loving trolls do.
|
|||