Fan vote. Because it's what the ridiculous casual fans want.

New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Idontpostmuch |
|||
|
Fan vote. Because it's what the ridiculous casual fans want. |
|||
Paparazzi |
|||
|
Revote in which Jerri would be forced to choose between Sandra and Parvati, or Russell joins the jury and casts the deciding vote. I think I remember hearing
somewhere that in the China FTC, Todd, Amanda and Courtney all cast a vote for the person they thought should win in case of a tie. Or is that just something I
made up in my head?
|
|||
feastonscraps19 |
|||
|
Its funny how this thread went from being sure that Sandra wins to now not knowing lol. Parvati FTW!!!
|
|||
checkinguy |
|||
|
A tie in ftc would be great drama. I didn't think Sandra was that great a player - but twice to ftc and at least one win (maybe two) is telling me -
she's for real. I'll look forward to seeing some moves, even if they are out of the spotlight.
Where is SU - it's been 7 days and no show - he/she is keeping a low profile now? |
|||
ParvatiMania |
|||
|
Of all the previous winners, Parvati (not Tom or Sandra or JT) is the one being highlighted in the promos. Doesn't mean she wins, but it shows that she
will be a key character this season.
|
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
|
They highlighted the best known players. Rupert (because he's an all time fan favorite), Parvati (as the winner of the most popular recent season), and
Russ (as the most notorious in the previous season). That's just good marketing and doesn't mean jack shit.
|
|||
LSiani |
|||
|
^ I wasn't saying it means that Parvati wins, but Natalie wasn't the most interesting player and she got a lot of a facetime before the first episode.
Just something I noticed.
|
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
LSiani wrote: Because she had nice tits and wore a bikini. Also great marketing and didn't mean jack shit. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
gretchensucks wrote: I just wanted to state that. We weren't sure that Sandra was the winner, so I thought this may cause some speculation for the winner...sorry... |
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
LSiani wrote:It's just advertising. Keep that in mind. Rupert (well known big hero), Russ (well knon recent nasty villain), Parvati/Natalie (gratuitous hot chicks)...that's the only relevance. |
|||
Rafting Persona Queen |
|||
|
There's no need to apologize it was just an observation. Some people are living in fear that Parvati might possibly beat Sandra and are lashing out as a
result, don't take it personally.
I don't understand where the turn around came from tho. It went from "Sandra wins" to "Parvati probably wins" in a matter of two posts with absolutely no justification. |
|||
LSiani |
|||
Rafting Persona Queen wrote: I meant it sarcastically |
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
Rafting Persona Queen wrote: The fact that my reasoned opinion that the advertisements are featuring the biggest audience draws boils down to "living in fear that Parvati might possibly win" shows how short sighted you (and a few others in here) are. You're starting to sound paranoid. I don't give a fuck if she wins or not. I like Parv and Sandra. But to say that her being featured in the advertisements is anything more than appealing to straight +$%@%' hard-ons is utterly dense. It's fucking advertising, they feature (1) the most well known, and (2) sexiest...to draw a fucking audience. "It's not rocket science." |
|||
ParvatiMania |
|||
|
Then why wouldn't they feature Amanda? Face it, Parvati is being featured for a reason. Not necessarily because she wins, but obviously she makes it far
and will be a major player this season. They're setting the stage.
The question with Sandra is why she is being hidden. She was the only one of the rumored final six not to have a confessional during the People's Choice Awards preview. |
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
ParvatiMania wrote: Because Parvati won one of the most popular seasons of the show...and looks better on television. Amanda looks like she has a corn cob up her ass on camera. Everyone in every preview are fan favorites...you guys are reading WAY too much into this. It looks pathetic. It's Marketing 101. |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
Also, you do realize that the preview that was shown at the People's Choice Awards was unfinished and edited. It's not the full opening and Sandra
could very well have a confessional.
Not that that really matters. Natalie was invisible for a full three episodes, and were Parvati or Bob really hyped up in Micronesia and Gabon? I don't think so. I just really don't think we can rely on editing anymore. |
|||
checkinguy |
|||
Not sure what fish you are trying to fry, but it's coming out half baked. Ok, of course the networks are in the business of getting and keeping viewers.. and sex sells. I think that you can't look at this quite so narrowly. They are setting the stage as well, getting a 'buy-in' to the season and setting the table, as mentioned. As a hetero M, nothing wrong with Amanda whatsoever. But if all you want is sex appeal, don't show Parv in a helicopter with her clothes on, show Danielle or Sugar with her top coming off, blurred out ..even. We have more access to sexy images than ever in history, we want more than just this.ParvatiMania wrote: |
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
checkinguy wrote: You're missing the greater point. Neither Sugar or Danielle have the following Parvati does. I've said from the beginning that that they're featuring popular players. Parvati won the most highly rated season in recent years. Danielle who? Sugar who? They get more bang for their buck with Parvati, featuring a chick in a bikini and a well known winner (talking about being a winner of another ASS season). Again, Marketing 101. Not rocket science. |
|||
Rafting Persona Queen |
|||
|
It wasn't just the PCA's, there are ads running now that focus on Colby, Rupert, Russell and Parvati (all of whom are rumored to go far) and Coach. All
were in the PCA promo too. Its just an observation. Sure, maybe it means nothing. Whatever. I dont see why that elicits the response of "SHUT THE FUCK UP
ITS MEANINGLESS *plugs ears* LALALALALA"
I like Sandra fine but I wouldn't freak out at any sign of her possibly not winning. There's no reason to doubt the spoilers but if someone brings up something they've noticed just...breathe. |
|||
gretchensucks |
|||
Rafting Persona Queen wrote:I guess I have to tell YOU specifically for a SECOND time that I don't give a fuck who wins between Parvati and Sandra. I dig both. I'm merely stating the obvious here. The fact that you think that the fact that Parv is in previews is somehow a "sign" that Sandra doesn't win shows how dense you are. We don't know who wins, only who makes the finals. And the advertisements aren't a fucking factor. What do Colby, Rupert, Russell, Jerri and Parvati have in common? Oh yeah, they're ALL fan favorites and arguably the most well known past Survivors from the most popular and/or recent seasons. Hmmm...maybe it'd be a great idea to put them in the advertisements.
Last Edited By: gretchensucks
01/20/10 09:40 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||