Thailandsurvivor wrote:
WylDawg wrote:Please explain how Chris needed immunity at the final 4. He just needed Eliza to not win it, and even then, he had a tie. If Scout or Twila won immunity, Chris was not going to get any votes.
I think the difference is needing immunity in order to survive. Physical threat or not, that means your strategic game is flawed on some level. For instance, a lot of winners HAD to win immunity at the final 4 (Vee, Jenna, Chris etc.) so clearly that's not impressive as someone who gets safely in the final 2.
And when was Tom ever in danger of being voted off anyways? He had Ian, Katie and Caryn in his pocket. He was safe no matter what.
.
Eliza was easier to beat in the challenges, as well as easier to beat in the final two. If Twila and Scout thought strategically, Chris would've been out without immunity. He undisputably needed it in the final three.









