
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SkyDreamer |
|||
|
|
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
Axie wrote: Not at all. I don't even remember him really "hating" them anyways. Didn't he love Matty and Kenny and Crystal? |
|||
Axie.rsfd |
|||
cindidindi76 wrote:He's always emphasizing how Fang is disjointed, and loses all the challenges, and lives crappily, there's always a remark! And the "previously on Survivor" segment on pre-merge episodes all basically say "Fang is crap".Axie wrote:Not at all. I don't even remember him really "hating" them anyways. Didn't he love Matty and Kenny and Crystal? |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Yeah, it was weird. Probst was a fan of Matty, Ken, Crystal, and Randy, but seemed to always be hating on Fang as a whole. It was weird how he liked them but would bash Fang seemingly constantly.
|
|||
Cyberball2072 |
|||
|
Since we are on the subject of Season 17, which without a doubt was not one of Survivor's better seasons......
Both on the show and in the commentary/rehash's that Probst did at the beginning of several of the episodes, Jeff Probst was vocally critical of Danny Brown, first in the way he more or less forced the "Leadership" issue on him and then in being critical of him taking it. It would have been one thing if being the "Leader" provided an in-game advantage. He did give him some necklace, if I remember correctly, but that was it. If there had been "Leader vote counts as two and breaks ties" or something that was an advantage to the game, then it would certainly be up to Danny to run with or shirk this duty. But it is a well established fact that people whom take leadership roles in the game are often targeted to be voted out. That was established in season 1 and more or less continued over the seasons. So was Probst in the wrong to continually target Danny with the leadership and to continually question him on the matter? I mean, I think it was bad enough to do this in game, at Tribal Council? For him to continue to do this in the recaps done in post production I think was rather unclassy of Probst to do.
|
|||
AussieOriginal |
|||
Cyberball2072 wrote:You couldn't see that I posted your comment just two posts above yours? Yet more evidence of your stupidity. And the point is not that you said "fuck", it's that you called me and the rest of us unintelligent because we said "fuck". Are you really so stupid that you couldn't remember saying "fuck" in your own post while putting me down for saying it too? And are you really so stupid to say something like that at Sucks? Even when numerous posters agreed without exception that you were a stupid moron, you tried to say it was everyone else. You have demonstrated your ignorance and stupidity repeatedly in this thread. You have made up lies about Probst and tried to pass it off as fact, you have started a stupid and pointless thread about how someone from RNO didn't respond to you (wow, no surprises there - surely you couldn't expect them to reply to a lunatic?), and even when that thread got locked you are so stupid you couldn't figure out why. And then you started another thread on the same thing. You are a fucking stupid moron. Got a problem with it? Don't post here. |
|||
survivorfanfromaustralia |
|||
|
well, cyberball was pissed that probst acknowledged natalie's game and did NOT acknowledge susie's game.......
my two cents both were arguably inactive strategically, both faced bitter juries.....the main difference between natalie and susie was, whilst both were proactive socially, natalie succeeded, susie didnt, thus natalie won, susie didn't. |
|||
SirCrocodilep |
|||
SkyDreamer wrote: how so? |
|||
Cyberball2072 |
|||
survivorfanfromaustralia wrote:I think Aussie, since she has claimed to be a female, is pmsing or something like that. Hopefully she will learn to shut her cock sucker. I hate using profanity but it seems to be all that she understands, so ignoring her is going to be a lot easier to do know. The fact that she does nothing but attack me personally and not acknowledge Survivor related issues is a pretty good indictment against her. The other major difference, Russell was not in position to win when you look at the final jury vote. What was the final vote? 7-2 was it? Kind of a blowout. Susie, was essentially if we are to take Randy at his word, was a cookie comment away from getting his vote. If Probst was more consistent with that one, he could have called out Bob for his lack of "strategy/gamesmanship" as well.
|
|||
SirCrocodilep |
|||
|
|
|||
Huntorr |
|||
|
Probst was a dick to Stephen in the F3 Tribal Council.
|
|||
AussieOriginal |
|||
You have completely overstepped the boundary with those comments. Sucks/Yuku has legal people so you will be hearing from them. I am done with you personally.
Last Edited By: AussieOriginal
02/02/10 08:56 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
AussieOriginal |
|||
survivorfanfromaustralia wrote:Survivorfan, just to be clear here, I was not talking about cyberball's comments about Susie etc. I was talking about his earlier posts when he made up a bunch of lies and presented them as fact. |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Hm, should we rename this topic "Things Cyberball did to REALLY piss off AO"?
|
|||
AussieOriginal |
|||
|
Like I said he has pissed off numerouse people - SJ, JPoZ, Axie to name just a few.
|
|||
Cyberball2072 |
|||
|
Ha, I had been trying to take the high road for the last day or so with Aussie. I actually had forgotten that I had said the F-word and the context of how I said it at the time, I was surprised to see her throw it out at me in the middle of what should have been a reasonable discussion of Jeff Probst and things he has done to piss one off.....
Which is the name of this thread. Go back and look at the number of times on this thread alone where she has used the F-Word on me. The other site I post at, usage of the f-word is an instant banning for at least 2 or 3 days. I was taking the high road as I expected her to get banned for it. When it was clear that she was not going to get banned, when she was intensifying her personal attacks against me and when it was clear that apparently on this site, that level of rhetoric is being allowed..... Damn right I threw it right back at her. Now, as to these "Lies" that I supposedly did, let's hear them. You realize that in many of the cases you are going to throw out, we are talking about stuff, some of it is stuff that is publically well known that it happened. Some of it is stuff that we only have one side out (Ie, Fairplay is the only one that has directly stated what caused the rift between him and Probst) although I saw another site that supposedly has Probst on the record saying that Fairplay dissed his brother or something to that effect. I am an objective person. So when I see Probst coerce Janu into quitting in Season 10, for example, I try to look at the level above it- I know he did not just do it on a whim or for entertainment purposes. So in investigate the behind the scenes reasonings why Probst would coerce Janu into quitting. Not that hard for any one with a brain, but oh well. As far as Aussies other comments, by my count, you used the F-Word on my first, and have proceeded to use the F-word no less then 22 times on me since 1/31/2010. So good luck with your legal stuff. Oh-you told me to get a life? You have 11,000+ posts in 5 years......I have 909 posts in 9 years..... Who is it that has no life??? So, in my final comment to you, Ms AussieOriginal, everything I said to you in that PM I will say right now.... SHUT YOUR FUCKING COCKSUCKER YOU STUPID GOD-DAMNED WHORE! |
|||
Axie.rsfd |
|||
AussieOriginal wrote:Yes he did. Poor Shii Ann! |
|||
SirCrocodilep |
|||
Axie wrote:AussieOriginal wrote:Yes he did. don't feel bad for Shi Ann... Feel bad for Aussie! |
|||
Cyberball2072 |
|||
AussieOriginal wrote: Yeah and I did it more or less by putting out posts, that on an other website I post at, it usually inspires several day's of intelligent debates there. Now, the other site is no where near as big as this one. Think about it- look at the posts that are getting people mad. They are posts that in some cases are conjecture, but in others are putting out information as part of the frame of reference to a debate. I got some f-bombs from someone just because I was speculating on whether Survivor's ratings are ever effected by the fact that other networks (here in the US) have intensified/raised the stakes on Thursday nights by pitting some of their more popular shows to go up against Survivor. It is very similar to back in 2001, when CBS announced, that of all nights they could have put Survivor on against, they chose to put it up against NBC's FRIENDS, which back then was #1. A gutsy pick, to be sure. But it worked. Remember also that part of Survivor's success for CBS was not just in Survivor's success, but the fact that it managed to give CSI it's legs in a primetime audience as well, and had a lot to do with that show's success as well in dethroning ER as the top show on TV. At least until American Idol came on. But I am starting to get that over there is like dealing with Oprah Winfrey's audience; whereas here is more a Jerry Springer show audience.
|
|||
SirCrocodilep |
|||
|
For what it is worth, I don't let this pissed me off.
Annoyed, maybe but pissed? Not yet. He haven't done anything notesworthy to anger me. |
|||