Survivor 20: Heroes vs Villains in Survivor Spoilers Forum

Survivor 20: Heroes vs Villains

Started By	Comment
JeffMaster		#361	[-]
Posts: 27 (02/06/10 02:06 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad Even Natalie had a key scene in episode 1, except it was spoken by Russell - "dumbass blonde". If Sandra wins, she will have a key scene or quote early in the first episode.
Bulletin Bored		#362	[-]
Posts: 21801 (02/06/10 02:14 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SkyDreamer, how long have you been watching Survivor? There have been underedited winners before Natalie. My main problem is that we usually don't get two "Who?" winners in a row. Vecepia was in between Ethan (still not great but better than hers) and Brian (awesome edit). Danni was in a Chris and Aras sandwich. Chris had the better story but Aras was present enough. Bob had Parvati (decent) and JT (great) on either side of him. Whoever wins HvV should at least have a better edit than Polly Sue's. It will be a shame if the entire story is about Russell and Parvati with Sandra winning out of nowhere.
tomash		#363	[-]
Posts: 3107 (02/06/10 02:29 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The producers will only harm themselves if they make it look like the winner didn't "deserve" to beat Russell this time around either. Hopefully the editors will edit him more like say Steph in Guatemala, explaining why he lost, so that the casual audience doesn't throw another fit.
JVJrule		#364	[-]
Posts: 4207 (02/06/10 02:55 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	JeffMaster wrote: Even Natalie had a key scene in episode 1, except it was spoken by Russell - "dumbass blonde". If Sandra wins, she will have a key scene or quote early in the first episode. Does "pee water" count? But true, Parv did have some major scenes in Micronesia ep. 1 being that she was the decoy boot.
cindidindi76		#365	[-]
Posts: 21641 (02/06/10 03:24 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Parvati's key scene in episode 1 was her saying she had to change her game this time around, paired with Alexis saying the "fans" had an advantage because they knew how all the "faves" played.
SkyDreamer		#366	[-]
Posts: 807 (02/06/10 04:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Bulletin Bored wrote: SkyDreamer, how long have you been watching Survivor? There have been underedited winners before Natalie. My main problem is that we usually don't get two "Who?" winners in a row. Vecepia was in between Ethan (still not great but better than hers) and Brian (awesome edit). Danni was in a Chris and Aras sandwich. Chris had the better story but Aras was present enough. Bob had Parvati (decent) and JT (great) on either side of him. Whoever wins HvV should at least have a better edit than Polly Sue's. It will be a shame if the entire story is about Russell and Parvati with Sandra winning out of nowhere. There have been winners with low visibility, but not nearly as ignored as Natalie. She hasn't said a word until episode 4.
CSCin3D		#367	[-]
Posts: 13883 (02/06/10 05:21 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Bulletin Bored wrote: SkyDreamer, how long have you been watching Survivor? There have been underedited winners before Natalie. My main problem is that we usually don't get two "Who?" winners in a row. Vecepia was in between Ethan (still not great but better than hers) and Brian (awesome edit). Danni was in a Chris and Aras sandwich. Chris had the better story but Aras was present enough. Bob had Parvati (decent) and JT (great) on either side of him. Whoever wins HvV should at least have a better edit than Polly Sue's. It will be a shame if the entire story is about Russell and Parvati with Sandra winning out of nowhere. To be fair, Natalie is really a totally new level of "who?" winner. She had less than 15 confessionals the entire season.
AmightyRo		#368	[-]
Posts: 1509 (02/06/10 05:54 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Natalie's low visibility though may just be because she really WAS UTR and didn't say much, so the producers and editors of the show didn't have much to work with.
Oowatanite		#369	[-]
Posts: 10238 (02/06/10 06:05 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	AmightyRo wrote: Natalie's low visibility though may just be because she really WAS UTR and didn't say much, so the producers and editors of the show didn't have much to work with. Natalie's lack of edit had nothing to do with what she gave the editors to work with, it had everything to do with SEG pumping up Russhole much much more than they needed to do.
Oowatanite		#370	[-]
Posts: 10239 (02/06/10 06:07 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad Bulletin Bored wrote: It will be a shame if the entire story is about Russell and Parvati with Sandra winning out of nowhere. This is what I am afraid will happen.
Oowatanite		#371	[-]
Posts: 10240 (02/06/10 06:09 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	AbsurdSchism wrote: Oowatanite wrote: speedyforme wrote: I thought SU already said he knew who the winner was because he told 2 posters here already in PMs or something. But he won't reveal it. SU does not KNOW who the winner is, he's just speculating like the rest of us, based on previews and spoiled 'events' and other insider 'tips' etc. etc, etc. Could he be right ? Well, he has a fifty/fifty chance, just like missyae's "Sandra wins" guess. And it's VERY similar to Bluto's "Amanda wins" guess in Survivor China. The early edit WILL give us the winner of S20. ^ agreed, SU if my guess was that far off then obviously you think you know how the vote will turn out. Might as well just tell us now before Edgic figures it out for you. Unless you can give us who wins before the season starts, then if Sandra wins the credit for spoiling S20 will go to Missy, not you. To be fair, SU did spoil the bootlist first (probably just to beat missyae to the punch). Missyae shortly posted his guess that "Sandra wins" in an attempt to save face.
AmightyRo		#372	[-]
Posts: 1510 (02/06/10 06:16 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Oowatanite wrote: Bulletin Bored wrote: It will be a shame if the entire story is about Russell and Parvati with Sandra winning out of nowhere. This is what I am afraid will happen. Werd. But it's all assumptions right now, but if I had to guess how the season would turn out based strictly on rumors, and past gameplay, then that's how I can envision it going down.
Antithesys		#373	[-]
Posts: 26086 (02/06/10 07:17 PM) Gadabout Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Unless you can give us who wins before the season starts, then if Sandra wins the credit for spoiling S20 will go to Missy, not you There has never been a season where spoiling the winner was anything more than an afterthought. It's the journey, not the destination, and the journey through S20 has been lit to unprecedented totality. If it turns out that it's led us the right way, SU's trophy will be in the mail...it's already got his name on it.
AlsoKnownAsJer2002		#374	[-]
Posts: 782 (02/06/10 07:34 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	indiekid26 wrote: I think the biggest spoiler for me thus far has been the one people seem to keep overlooking - Sandra throwing a huge part at the top of the Renaissance hotel the weekend of the Survivor 10 year reunion. Not saying she already has the million dollars from the show, that's stupid, but it certainly implies that she knew she could expense that sort of thing. Christa threw that party.
craig		#375	[-]
Posts: 17099 (02/06/10 09:23 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SU never said he knew the winner, just that he had a fair idea how a bunch of jurrors voted, and it could go either way between Parv and Sandra. Natalie at least was always Positive and had her relationship with Russ set up ep.1. And Russ was super-N ep.1. Sandra doesn't have it in her to be edited UTRP like Danni and Natalie. She is too bitchy. We've never had a UTRN winner, or 2 straight seasns that were about the Star losing. And Probst is really liking this season and his admiration for Parv has grown. If Parvati (a) get lots of airtime (b) is positive and (c) somewhat vulnerable ep.1, she probably wins. There was a women's promo with Parv saying "I have a big targe on my back." That's very good for a winner. Last Edited By: craig 02/06/10 10:14 PM. Edited 2 times.
JVJrule		#376	[-]
Posts: 4218 (02/06/10 09:24 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	craig wrote: SU never siad he knew the winner, just that he had a fair idea how a bunch of jurrors voted, and it could go either way between Parv and Sandra. Natalie at least was always Positice and had her relationship with Russ set up ep.1. And Russ was super-N ep.1. Sandra doesn\t have it in her to be edited UTRP like Danni and Natalie, she is too bitchy. Weve never had a UTRN winner. If Parvati (a) get lots of airtime (b) is positive and (c) somewhat vulnerable ep.1, she probably wins. There was a women's promo with Parv saying "I have a big targe on my back." That's very good for a winner. In the very same promo, Sandra is the one that is shown last. In the male counterpart video, Russell, the last male in HvV is the last one shown. So I dunno. I'm nervous.
chapera rocks		#377	[-]
Posts: 12898 (02/06/10 09:55 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Shhhh, don't disturb his fantasy.
SurvivorsUnite		#378	[-]
Posts: 414 (02/06/10 11:11 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	JeffMaster wrote: Well if he wants bragging rights he should reveal it before Thursday. Otherwise people will say he guessed the winner based on editing. I'm not saying that to goad SU into revealing his information. It's just a fact. What? Editing? What? Editing really means nothing.
PrettyGoodYear1988		#379	[-]
Posts: 3343 (02/06/10 11:11 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Anyone else think it's a good thing that we don't know exactly who will win? I mean, I like that it seems like a close call between Sandra and Parvati. I personally couldn't ask for a better F2.
SurvivorsUnite		#380	[-]
Posts: 415 (02/06/10 11:13 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad gretchensucks wrote: Sandra says in her little preview "no one ever put my name on a piece of parchement." It'll be interesting to see if she can make it to the final three again without any votes. Just wondering if they were trying to remind us of that. Don't quote me. But, i believe she gets votes thrown at her this time.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Survivor 20: Heroes vs Villains