Official R.I. Ladies T & A Thread in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

Official R.I. Ladies T & A Thread

Started By	Comment
duckfarmer0000		#521	[-]
Posts: 4836 (05/09/11 09:58 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Ad free zone Remove this ad Vatican Assassin Warlock wrote: duckfarmer0000 wrote: There's probably privacy issues surrounding that. And if they bring it in for a new season I'm sure it will turn people away. They sign contracts. If survivor wanted uncensored stuff, they could put it in their. Just like blind date, cops, cheaters, and even Jerry Springer have had uncensored dvd's. Contracts probably does include a line that the producers can use all footage asis, just they never have. The only only people who could bitch, and have a clause are all-stars. There is probably a line in the contract outlining the use of all footage but still he responsibility of the editing team to pixel Out any nudity from the players. If the contract said all nudity could be shown, there will be people decline a spot on the show because they are not comfortable with it. The producers have a duty of care for the privacy of the players.
Salarakas		#522	[-]
Posts: 1397 (05/09/11 09:58 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Does Big Brother US really have no nudity? Across the pond they show pretty much everything (sadly, no toilet cam yet) to the 24/7 viewers and sometimes clips on the main show as well. It's up to the housemates to decide whether they want to take a shower in their bathing suits for 3 months straight or not. Some over here do must most don't. I know I certainly wouldn't.
X Steve		#523	[-]
Posts: 147 (05/09/11 10:17 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	duckfarmer0000 wrote: Vatican Assassin Warlock wrote: duckfarmer0000 wrote: There's probably privacy issues surrounding that. And if they bring it in for a new season I'm sure it will turn people away. They sign contracts. If survivor wanted uncensored stuff, they could put it in their. Just like blind date, cops, cheaters, and even Jerry Springer have had uncensored dvd's. Contracts probably does include a line that the producers can use all footage asis, just they never have. The only only people who could bitch, and have a clause are all-stars. There is probably a line in the contract outlining the use of all footage but still he responsibility of the editing team to pixel Out any nudity from the players. If the contract said all nudity could be shown, there will be people decline a spot on the show because they are not comfortable with it. The producers have a duty of care for the privacy of the players. I don't know if a un-censored version would work, but they blur more than they probably need to.
Vatican Assassin Warlock		#524	[-]
Posts: 240 (05/09/11 12:35 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	duckfarmer0000 wrote: Vatican Assassin Warlock wrote: duckfarmer0000 wrote: There's probably privacy issues surrounding that. And if they bring it in for a new season I'm sure it will turn people away. They sign contracts. If survivor wanted uncensored stuff, they could put it in their. Just like blind date, cops, cheaters, and even Jerry Springer have had uncensored dvd's. Contracts probably does include a line that the producers can use all footage asis, just they never have. The only only people who could bitch, and have a clause are all-stars. There is probably a line in the contract outlining the use of all footage but still he responsibility of the editing team to pixel Out any nudity from the players. If the contract said all nudity could be shown, there will be people decline a spot on the show because they are not comfortable with it. The producers have a duty of care for the privacy of the players. The producers have no duty. If you get naked on cam, then its your own fault. I'm not saying the cameras should follow them to the bathroom, or when cleaning themselves, but if they're fooling around with another survivor, getting naked for peanut-butter, , or lose clothing in challenges its fair game. Sure if no line is in their already giving them legal right, some of the survivors alumni would probablt not have done the show, but so what? They have thousands of people applying each year, and could easily cast a show of willing people who are better then the LA casting they do now. Speaking of which, the LA people who are found are almost always people looking for fame, so I doubt half the people on this show would care. At worst we would lose the religious people, which frankly I could live without. Sorry Matt fan.
jordantoine		#525	[-]
Posts: 9 (05/09/11 12:46 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	X Steve wrote: duckfarmer0000 wrote: Vatican Assassin Warlock wrote: They sign contracts. If survivor wanted uncensored stuff, they could put it in their. Just like blind date, cops, cheaters, and even Jerry Springer have had uncensored dvd's. Contracts probably does include a line that the producers can use all footage asis, just they never have. The only only people who could bitch, and have a clause are all-stars. There is probably a line in the contract outlining the use of all footage but still he responsibility of the editing team to pixel Out any nudity from the players. If the contract said all nudity could be shown, there will be people decline a spot on the show because they are not comfortable with it. The producers have a duty of care for the privacy of the players. I don't know if a un-censored version would work, but they blur more than they probably need to. agreed. have you watched china recently? amanda's ass is blurred every single time it appears on the screen
Double Edged Sword		#526	[-]
Posts: 8047 (05/09/11 03:37 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	jordantoine wrote: agreed. have you watched china recently? amanda's ass is blurred every single time it appears on the screen Yet they didn't feel the need to blur Manise's 10 foot long cleavage.
maverick2689		#527	[-]
Posts: 195 (05/09/11 05:44 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	LookinUP wrote: Uncensored Survivor would consist of D-list ex porn stars and toothless strippers. No thank you I don't care who you are, that shit there ^^^^ is FUNNY.
PennaPennaPenna		#528	[-]
Posts: 1758 (05/09/11 07:17 PM) Premium, A1, tight-wad Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I have to admit, I don't really want to see Amanda's ass. She's not the one for me.
duckfarmer0000		#529	[-]
Posts: 4863 (05/09/11 07:26 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	PennaPennaPenna wrote: I have to admit, I don't really want to see Amanda's ass. She's not the one for me. Too tall or too short?
PennaPennaPenna		#530	[-]
Posts: 1761 (05/09/11 07:48 PM) Premium, A1, tight-wad Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Ad free zone Remove this ad LOL! Oddly enough, I hadn't even given that a thought! (That's all just talk for another thread.) I don't think I belong in this thread, I go by perceived intelligence. As near as I can tell, Amanda's a moron. It kind of goes with that "cow thing" she's got gong on. (I think somebody commented on it, in one of the seasons. I can't remember who.)
duckfarmer0000		#531	[-]
Posts: 4870 (05/09/11 07:49 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I think this thread has gone off the rails a bit. Take out Dj's images and it starts to look kinda creepy. I mean, the talk about wanting to see an uncensored Survivor then arguing that there is a clause in their contracts about it and the producers have no responsibility at all is pathetic.
PennaPennaPenna		#532	[-]
Posts: 1762 (05/09/11 07:53 PM) Premium, A1, tight-wad Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I have a way of showing up when threads fly off the rails. It's nothing to be ashamed of... It's kind of what I do. Troll around looking for train wrecks. What this thread needs is more cameltoe and less talk! :)
Django		#533	[-]
Posts: 1332 (05/09/11 08:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts
duckfarmer0000		#534	[-]
Posts: 4873 (05/09/11 08:03 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Why is the 636 blurred out?
marshal99		#535	[-]
Posts: 1984 (05/09/11 08:11 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Ashley looks so much better without makeup.
duckfarmer0000		#536	[-]
Posts: 4879 (05/09/11 08:20 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	marshal99 wrote: Ashley looks so much better without makeup. X
X Steve		#537	[-]
Posts: 148 (05/10/11 12:45 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	jordantoine wrote: X Steve wrote: duckfarmer0000 wrote: There is probably a line in the contract outlining the use of all footage but still he responsibility of the editing team to pixel Out any nudity from the players. If the contract said all nudity could be shown, there will be people decline a spot on the show because they are not comfortable with it. The producers have a duty of care for the privacy of the players. I don't know if a un-censored version would work, but they blur more than they probably need to. agreed. have you watched china recently? amanda's ass is blurred every single time it appears on the screen My point exactly. Less blurring would've been better.
duckfarmer0000		#538	[-]
Posts: 4901 (05/10/11 12:48 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Blurring Amandas bum when she still has her bathing suit on is ridiculous. We've had bare asses on tv during the day down here. Me thinks Americans are too politically correct and too fiddley and cautious. They need to chillax.
duckfarmer0000		#539	[-]
Posts: 4902 (05/10/11 12:49 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Who watched the tar finale? See the bum cheek blurring in Rio? Those women weren't nude.
X Steve		#540	[-]
Posts: 149 (05/10/11 12:59 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Ad free zone Remove this ad duckfarmer0000 wrote: Who watched the tar finale? See the bum cheek blurring in Rio? Those women weren't nude. I know, and they were women out in public...

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Official R.I. Ladies T & A Thread