S22E14 - Seems Like a No- Brainer in Survivor Spoilers Forum

0 Points

S22E14 - Seems Like a No- Brainer

Started By	Comment
Liisa		#241	[-]
Posts: 146 (05/14/11 01:11 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Pshhhh we have secret to share Remove this ad FistOLegend wrote: Matt's not getting a 'winner's edit' and that clip does seem to suggest closure for his story, which sort of culminated in Julie being born again a few episodes back. I'm betting on Andrea as redemptee. She has the angle of wanting to get back at Ometepe. I know alot who think Matt is getting a winner`s edit for sure. Also if anyone has more story to be seen it`s Matt, the person burned twice by his tribe coming back to try & get revenge, seems way more likely.
rower		#242	[-]
Posts: 3319 (05/14/11 01:38 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Liisa - It's clear that you are a Matt fan and everyone here is a fan of someone. But look at reality. Matt has gotten this far only because he hasn't had to "play" the game, he has been helped by a twist which gives him 3, 4, 5 chances to get back into the "game", he has said himself that he isn't good at the game and the statements go on and on and on. The challenges he has "won" (and I use that term loosely because you don't have to win on RI, you only can't lose) have been parlor games compared to what the remaining tribe has had to endure. Finally, the chink in Matt's "holier than thou" demeanor has been exposed the last episode in his treatment to Andrea. He told her that it was her NOT him who refused to flip (a lie because he was the one who made the final decision about whether he and Andrea should join up with the Zaps) and then he said (with sarcasm) "I'm sorry I ruined your Survivor game" when she called him out about blabbing all to Rob and throwing her under the bus. Then in response to her remarks he just said "I'm going to bed now" shutting her out completely. Not exactly WWJD. I don't see this as a "winners" edit, interesting storyline in a season where they wanted to really promote the RI twist but nothing more. IF Matt were to make it to the final 3 and win, it would make a total mockery of the entire premise that Survivor was founded on.
Liisa		#243	[-]
Posts: 150 (05/14/11 02:07 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	rower wrote: Liisa - It's clear that you are a Matt fan and everyone here is a fan of someone. But look at reality. Matt has gotten this far only because he hasn't had to "play" the game, he has been helped by a twist which gives him 3, 4, 5 chances to get back into the "game", he has said himself that he isn't good at the game and the statements go on and on and on. The challenges he has "won" (and I use that term loosely because you don't have to win on RI, you only can't lose) have been parlor games compared to what the remaining tribe has had to endure. Finally, the chink in Matt's "holier than thou" demeanor has been exposed the last episode in his treatment to Andrea. He told her that it was her NOT him who refused to flip (a lie because he was the one who made the final decision about whether he and Andrea should join up with the Zaps) and then he said (with sarcasm) "I'm sorry I ruined your Survivor game" when she called him out about blabbing all to Rob and throwing her under the bus. Then in response to her remarks he just said "I'm going to bed now" shutting her out completely. Not exactly WWJD. I don't see this as a "winners" edit, interesting storyline in a season where they wanted to really promote the RI twist but nothing more. IF Matt were to make it to the final 3 and win, it would make a total mockery of the entire premise that Survivor was founded on. But this season as so many have said the edits don`t seem as important as previous seasons, I still say the RI returnee could be the winner. Whoever it is. So what they showed Matt being bitchy at Andrea, in some ways he has good reason to be, she agreed to support him & then went back to Rob.
rower		#244	[-]
Posts: 3325 (05/14/11 02:51 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	NO. Andrea did not spill her guts to Rob and bail on Matt. Lets get that straight. Andrea was nervous about making the flip BUT Matt decided to stick with Rob the spilled the whole plan to Rob then threw Andrea under the bus with Rob. Matt left Andrea NO CHOICE in the matter. She had to go along with the O's vote because of Matt's big mouth and the fact that he threw her under the bus with the O's. So use that as an excuse for Matt to be "bitchy" towards Andrea, he created the problem not Andrea. If you recall, the vote for the O's was going to be Mike until Matt got chatty with Rob. Apparently, Mike and Ralph did not know that it was MATT who blew the whistle on the plan for them to flip to the Zaps until Andrea called him out on it at RI.
survivorgirl22		#245	[-]
Posts: 1612 (05/14/11 02:59 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	btw what time is the finale 8 or 9 est?
rower		#246	[-]
Posts: 3327 (05/14/11 03:03 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	8:00 EST. Can't wait
idoitmyway		#247	[-]
Posts: 91 (05/14/11 04:58 PM) I don't get most of the jokes Reply Quote More Recent Posts	rower wrote: 8:00 EST. Can't wait Actually it is 8:00EDT ;)
Robinson		#248	[-]
Posts: 73 (05/14/11 05:03 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Couldn't the title refer to a person being a no-brainer? I've heard no-brainer as an insult for stupid people i.e. people w/o a brain. It could be someone referring to Rob not playing his Idol and being voted off or such.
Liisa		#249	[-]
Posts: 159 (05/14/11 05:40 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	So what exactly did Julie say in that Australian interview cause if she said she did not vote for Rob, Nat or Phillip then some of them may not be in the Final 3 right? What were her exact words?? This makes me think the RI returnee might make Final 3. I also remember Steve slipping & saying in his exit interview that Matt was a Zap so I think Mike or Matt making it to Final 3 means they have a great chance.
survivorfan33		#250	[-]
Posts: 131 (05/14/11 05:56 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Pshhhh we have secret to share Remove this ad Liisa wrote: So what exactly did Julie say in that Australian interview cause if she said she did not vote for Rob, Nat or Phillip then some of them may not be in the Final 3 right? What were her exact words?? This makes me think the RI returnee might make Final 3. I also remember Steve slipping & saying in his exit interview that Matt was a Zap so I think Mike or Matt making it to Final 3 means they have a great chance. She said "Natalie doesn't do anything she's not getting my vote, I'm definitely not voting for Phillip and I don't want to vote for Rob." The context she was speaking in was that she was saying that she was pulling for Matt or Mike to make a comeback and then she said why she didn't like those three. She didn't even mention Ashley. So she isn't saying who is in the final 3 just who she wants to win out of who's left. But the fact that she didn't mention Ashley probably means she's not there.
Antithesys		#251	[-]
Posts: 28313 (05/14/11 06:03 PM) Gadabout Reply Quote More Recent Posts	What were her exact words?? I suppose what you could do is read the fucking thread, where you'll find two posts quoting exactly what she said, as well as a link to the actual interview.
mikeonfilm		#252	[-]
Posts: 2083 (05/14/11 06:50 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	survivorfan33 wrote: She didn't even mention Ashley. So she isn't saying who is in the final 3 just who she wants to win out of who's left. But the fact that she didn't mention Ashley probably means she's not there. Or that she's the winner.
RyAn MaGnEr 87		#253	[-]
Posts: 548 (05/14/11 06:58 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	^ Definatly considering her edit.
VeeRazzles		#254	[-]
Posts: 2445 (05/14/11 07:37 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I think that Julie was just trying not to spoil anything so she just didn't mention her.
RyAn MaGnEr 87		#255	[-]
Posts: 550 (05/14/11 07:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts
SucksSucks		#256	[-]
Posts: 787 (05/14/11 07:55 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	survivorfan33 wrote: Liisa wrote: So what exactly did Julie say in that Australian interview cause if she said she did not vote for Rob, Nat or Phillip then some of them may not be in the Final 3 right? What were her exact words?? This makes me think the RI returnee might make Final 3. I also remember Steve slipping & saying in his exit interview that Matt was a Zap so I think Mike or Matt making it to Final 3 means they have a great chance. She said "Natalie doesn't do anything she's not getting my vote, I'm definitely not voting for Phillip and I don't want to vote for Rob." The context she was speaking in was that she was saying that she was pulling for Matt or Mike to make a comeback and then she said why she didn't like those three. She didn't even mention Ashley. So she isn't saying who is in the final 3 just who she wants to win out of who's left. But the fact that she didn't mention Ashley probably means she's not there. It doesn't mean she doesn't vote for Rob. It may mean Rob is the lessor of the three evils. Anyway, she may have said that after watching the events unfold on TV. Friendships and enemies form among contestants post game after watching the events unfold on TV which they weren't aware of while playing the game.
Bjorkrazy		#257	[-]
Posts: 1558 (05/14/11 09:55 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Meh. New prediction: Boston Rob sweeps the vote next to Natalie and Phillip 9-0-0, and in an unprecedented move CBS decides to show every single vote Micronesia F5 style. One of the jurors will say "seems like a no-brainer" when holding up their parchment. Move on to Probst declaring Rob the bestest Survivor ever, who can never be topped.
Pumpkin37		#258	[-]
Posts: 4633 (05/14/11 10:49 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Robinson wrote: Couldn't the title refer to a person being a no-brainer? I've heard no-brainer as an insult for stupid people i.e. people w/o a brain. It could be someone referring to Rob not playing his Idol and being voted off or such. No. No brainer is specifically about a decision. Obviously about who to get rid of.
Pumpkin37		#259	[-]
Posts: 4634 (05/14/11 10:52 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Bjorkrazy wrote: Meh. New prediction: Boston Rob sweeps the vote next to Natalie and Phillip 9-0-0, and in an unprecedented move CBS decides to show every single vote Micronesia F5 style. One of the jurors will say "seems like a no-brainer" when holding up their parchment. Move on to Probst declaring Rob the bestest Survivor ever, who can never be topped. Ya. Starting to think this is the case.
doratheexplorer		#260	[-]
Posts: 1408 (05/14/11 10:53 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Pshhhh we have secret to share Remove this ad Bjorkrazy wrote: Meh. New prediction: Boston Rob sweeps the vote next to Natalie and Phillip 9-0-0, and in an unprecedented move CBS decides to show every single vote Micronesia F5 style. One of the jurors will say "seems like a no-brainer" when holding up their parchment. Move on to Probst declaring Rob the bestest Survivor ever, who can never be topped. This is possibly the best explanation yet.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

S22E14 - Seems Like a No- Brainer