Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 7
(10/28/11 10:22 PM)
EverySurvivorEver wrote:LemmeSmashIt wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: Rupert is the most consistent player. There.Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct.
LemmeSmashIt wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: Rupert is the most consistent player. There.Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.
EverySurvivorEver wrote: Rupert is the most consistent player. There.
Posts: 52
(10/28/11 10:26 PM)
SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: LemmeSmashIt wrote: Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct. No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her.
EverySurvivorEver wrote: LemmeSmashIt wrote: Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct.
LemmeSmashIt wrote: Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.
Posts: 8
(10/28/11 11:08 PM)
EverySurvivorEver wrote:SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct. No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her. I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love.
SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct. No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her.
EverySurvivorEver wrote: Two does not equal more than three. Insert capitalized 'there' thinking I'm clever and that I'm definitively correct.
Posts: 109
(10/29/11 01:06 AM)
Posts: 54
(10/29/11 08:28 AM)
SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: SpadeSafety wrote: No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her. I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love. Then what are you arguing, his personality is underrated? His dumb ass got him $1million while he swam around catching fish, oblivious to the game, while everybody else was actually playing. There's no way he deserves more popularity than what he currently has. If you're not talking about his strategy, why did you call him "consistent"? Also, if you're basing quality of character on how many times a player appears on the show, you're admitting that he is inferior to both Boston Rob and Russell. Rob has been on 4 and Russell has been on 3, plus they liked him so much they got his nephew. And these "games" you clam he wins at, he's still inferior to Russell, Russell has wan twice, once against Rupert. But just looking at sheer personality, Rupert is a complete self obsessed buffoon As a list of things he has done: *threatened to beat up Fairplay after voting against him *spent half of HvVillains complaining about his toe *lost most of the Heroes' flint on day 1 *starts HvV obsessing over how much better being a hero is (never mind the fact that our introduction to Rupert is stealing peoples' shoes) *39 days later, as a member of jury he stands up and makes Sandra an honorary Hero, seemingly the only person who still gives a shit about the titles *holds grudge against Stephenie for becoming new icon of Survivor years after he's even been on the show *runs for governor when he clearly can't strategize for shit *plays up his grudge against Fairplay, while Fairplay lives his life not giving two shits about Rupert *digs a trench for a shelter (to be fair though, I did that too when I was 12 years old)
EverySurvivorEver wrote: SpadeSafety wrote: No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her. I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love.
SpadeSafety wrote: No, but 2 wins is greater than 0. Any argument you can make about Rupert's gameplay, you can make about Sandra's, plus tack on the fact that she actually manages to win and people like her.
Posts: 550
(10/29/11 09:34 AM)
Posts: 5271
(10/29/11 09:56 AM)
Registered user
EverySurvivorEver wrote:SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love. Then what are you arguing, his personality is underrated? His dumb ass got him $1million while he swam around catching fish, oblivious to the game, while everybody else was actually playing. There's no way he deserves more popularity than what he currently has. If you're not talking about his strategy, why did you call him "consistent"? Also, if you're basing quality of character on how many times a player appears on the show, you're admitting that he is inferior to both Boston Rob and Russell. Rob has been on 4 and Russell has been on 3, plus they liked him so much they got his nephew. And these "games" you clam he wins at, he's still inferior to Russell, Russell has wan twice, once against Rupert. But just looking at sheer personality, Rupert is a complete self obsessed buffoon As a list of things he has done: *threatened to beat up Fairplay after voting against him *spent half of HvVillains complaining about his toe *lost most of the Heroes' flint on day 1 *starts HvV obsessing over how much better being a hero is (never mind the fact that our introduction to Rupert is stealing peoples' shoes) *39 days later, as a member of jury he stands up and makes Sandra an honorary Hero, seemingly the only person who still gives a shit about the titles *holds grudge against Stephenie for becoming new icon of Survivor years after he's even been on the show *runs for governor when he clearly can't strategize for shit *plays up his grudge against Fairplay, while Fairplay lives his life not giving two shits about Rupert *digs a trench for a shelter (to be fair though, I did that too when I was 12 years old) Why'd you write me an essay just because Rupert has always made the jury? And won a million dollars more than you? :S
SpadeSafety wrote: EverySurvivorEver wrote: I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love. Then what are you arguing, his personality is underrated? His dumb ass got him $1million while he swam around catching fish, oblivious to the game, while everybody else was actually playing. There's no way he deserves more popularity than what he currently has. If you're not talking about his strategy, why did you call him "consistent"? Also, if you're basing quality of character on how many times a player appears on the show, you're admitting that he is inferior to both Boston Rob and Russell. Rob has been on 4 and Russell has been on 3, plus they liked him so much they got his nephew. And these "games" you clam he wins at, he's still inferior to Russell, Russell has wan twice, once against Rupert. But just looking at sheer personality, Rupert is a complete self obsessed buffoon As a list of things he has done: *threatened to beat up Fairplay after voting against him *spent half of HvVillains complaining about his toe *lost most of the Heroes' flint on day 1 *starts HvV obsessing over how much better being a hero is (never mind the fact that our introduction to Rupert is stealing peoples' shoes) *39 days later, as a member of jury he stands up and makes Sandra an honorary Hero, seemingly the only person who still gives a shit about the titles *holds grudge against Stephenie for becoming new icon of Survivor years after he's even been on the show *runs for governor when he clearly can't strategize for shit *plays up his grudge against Fairplay, while Fairplay lives his life not giving two shits about Rupert *digs a trench for a shelter (to be fair though, I did that too when I was 12 years old)
EverySurvivorEver wrote: I made no arguement about anyone's gameplay. Rupert also wins, and lots of people like him. Just not sucks. Youtube pages still amass Rupert love.
Posts: 56
(10/29/11 11:53 AM)
super pole2000 wrote: The idea of what an over or under rated player is changes from the hardcore to the casual fanbase. Rupert is a perfect example of this: overrated amongst casuals, underrated amongst hardcore.
(11/01/11 04:13 AM)
Posts: 2207
(11/01/11 07:16 AM)
(11/01/11 10:06 AM)
(11/01/11 10:08 AM)
Posts: 353
(11/01/11 11:59 AM)
LemmeSmashIt wrote:EverySurvivorEver wrote:AHumbleDiscipleOfGregBuis wrote: lol come on, Rupert? CHASE?? Opinions are opinions, but come on now. Rupert is the most consistent player. There.Sandra is the most consistent player. THERE.
EverySurvivorEver wrote:AHumbleDiscipleOfGregBuis wrote: lol come on, Rupert? CHASE?? Opinions are opinions, but come on now. Rupert is the most consistent player. There.
AHumbleDiscipleOfGregBuis wrote: lol come on, Rupert? CHASE?? Opinions are opinions, but come on now.
Posts: 226
(11/01/11 02:02 PM)
Posts: 11261
(11/01/11 02:11 PM)
Posts: 25
(11/01/11 02:52 PM)
Posts: 19
(11/01/11 03:42 PM)
Posts: 11155
(11/01/11 03:56 PM)
Registered User
Posts: 539
(11/01/11 04:39 PM)
Posts: 5884
(11/01/11 04:55 PM)
Share This Link