Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 20455
(12/15/11 02:28 PM)
Posts: 5596
(12/15/11 03:20 PM)
Registered user
Posts: 1055
(12/15/11 04:04 PM)
Posts: 20457
(12/15/11 05:00 PM)
This group of chefs, more than in any season prior, seemed to be thinking about how to win the game, and at this early stage, seemed to be saying to themselves, “Hey! Just don’t go home! Stay in the middle of the pack until the end. Then step it up.” Like pacing oneself in a marathon. And with a dinner for 200, yes, they could say, “That’s a lot of people -- let’s play it safe.” But they could have been far more creative than they were. This points to aproblem inherent in a group challenge like this: When creating dishes by committee, no one puts themselves out there and says “I want to go out on a limb with this, and I don’t care if the group doesn’t want me to.” So nothing soars. Furthermore, the food lacks a point of view -- any chance of one has been eradicated by the process. This is why restaurant kitchens are not run by committee. There is a chef and there are sous-chefs. The chef oversees everything and makes sure the dishes cohere, that there is that point of view. It’s important to have that point of view. That’s the problem with these group challenges: the point of view gets lost. Further, there’s no one to whom everyone else must answer, to ensure that a plan of action runs smoothly. There is no one chef to whom all need to listen.
This points to aproblem inherent in a group challenge like this: When creating dishes by committee, no one puts themselves out there and says “I want to go out on a limb with this, and I don’t care if the group doesn’t want me to.” So nothing soars. Furthermore, the food lacks a point of view -- any chance of one has been eradicated by the process.
This is why restaurant kitchens are not run by committee. There is a chef and there are sous-chefs. The chef oversees everything and makes sure the dishes cohere, that there is that point of view. It’s important to have that point of view. That’s the problem with these group challenges: the point of view gets lost. Further, there’s no one to whom everyone else must answer, to ensure that a plan of action runs smoothly. There is no one chef to whom all need to listen.
Posts: 2749
(12/15/11 06:11 PM)
Registered User
Posts: 15130
(12/15/11 06:28 PM)
Posts: 1994
(12/15/11 07:11 PM)
Posts: 20458
(12/15/11 07:18 PM)
Posts: 10135
(12/15/11 07:33 PM)
LOLABINGO wrote:Did you notice if they got to choose those steaks or if the pitiful things were the only thing they were allowed to work with?
Posts: 3150
(12/15/11 08:17 PM)
Posts: 2102
(12/15/11 10:04 PM)
"Jay Leno is funny"
Posts: 7306
(12/15/11 10:19 PM)
Posts: 770
(12/15/11 10:25 PM)
Posts: 20459
(12/15/11 10:50 PM)
Posts: 1119
(12/15/11 11:02 PM)
Posts: 944
(12/15/11 11:17 PM)
Posts: 1121
(12/15/11 11:55 PM)
Posts: 416
(12/16/11 04:21 AM)
Posts: 3396
(12/16/11 05:38 AM)
Top Chef Texas. Serving raw meat and soggy sweet potato fries.
It seems like they started with fifty contestants and we're only down to forty five every week, with the chance of adding another one from the "cook off" only to be seen on the online deal they have going on this year. They're gonna have to have several triple eliminations for the next four weeks to bring this bullshit in on their production schedule. I will say this though, there are some very talented chefs this season, unfortunately most of whom will be eliminated for not loading enough salt in their dish or cooking a protein that might be medium instead of rare or raw.I've never understood why the contestants don't include a tiny, little, individual crystal salt shaker filled with Himalayan salt with gold leaf flecks in it so the judges can get their sodium fix if the dish is not briny enough.
Posts: 8013
(12/16/11 09:12 AM)
Share This Link