Real H'wives of Beverly Hills: We're Not Buyin' It, Taylor in Other Shows that Suck Forum

0 Points

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Real H'wives of Beverly Hills: We're Not Buyin' It, Taylor

Started By

Comment

FineWine2

[-]

Posts: 963

(01/17/12 06:45 PM)

Registered user

There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.
Remove this ad

Interesting. Kim has no filter so she must have said things Bravo didn't want aired. Take two.

LOLABINGO

[-]

Posts: 20672

(01/17/12 06:46 PM)

Yup.

I want to know what they were.

seaguy

[-]

Posts: 26672

(01/17/12 06:56 PM)

Registered User

And she is pointing so you know she means business.

kczar

[-]

Posts: 793

(01/17/12 06:58 PM)

Isn't Kennedy six?

LOLABINGO

[-]

Posts: 20673

(01/17/12 07:28 PM)

Posted with permission from the creator of this, it's easier to visualize the timeline for me with this.

user posted image

Mrs Krista Boogie

[-]

Posts: 2359

(01/17/12 07:52 PM)

LOLABINGO wrote:
Party Pictures from Bravo.

So, why was Kim edited out of the whole Taylor and shrink bring everyone down scene?

Oh and WOW about Cedric statements and Producer emails!

The logistics of shooting this with and without Kim (oh God forbid, digitally removing her) make my head spin. Do you think one of the producers suggested Kim take a bathroom break for an hour or so they could reshoot? Also, does Sur only have one freaking bathroom? Come on, Lisa, get Pandora slightly less obnoxious wedding invitations and splurge on an extra stall!

zippityboomboom

[-]

Posts: 14838

(01/17/12 08:00 PM)

Registered User

Connie Sewer wrote:

zippityboomboom wrote:
Oh give me a break. I know a lot of people who give their toddlers M&Ms for peeing/pooping in the toilet. Elementary school children get conduct cards where if they have good behavior and turn in their homework, they get a small prize at the end of the week. Incentives work for children. It gives them a goal, a means to reach it, and a way to document it.

I agree about the potty training, but Kennedy is five years old now, long past potty training. Taylor would never, ever give Kennedy m&ms for a "reward", she might get fat, and that would never do for Taylor's self image.

Anybody that read the chart and thinks it was healthy for a five year old child, is just misinformed. It was detached and self serving in it's entirety, and not motivated by a truly caring mother.

I'm pretty much informed that you're a humorless, know-it-all harpy.

survivorfan320

[-]

Posts: 814

(01/17/12 08:41 PM)

Registered user

Vulture recap

http://nymag.com/daily/en...season-2-episode-19.html

moordy9

[-]

Posts: 55

(01/17/12 08:49 PM)

I seriously hope both Cedric and Taylor will be run over by a train or something and die the most horrible death.

LOLABINGO

[-]

Posts: 20674

(01/17/12 08:51 PM)

There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.
Remove this ad

Ken and Kim on the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills are a psa on not doing drugs.

bklynMaggs

[-]

Posts: 2685

(01/17/12 08:53 PM)

^zip I think you've been misinformed about Connie. You 2 should just agree to disagree. And really it's a moot point because [phaedra voice] everybody knowsssss......that Taylor just made that list up to appear to be a hands on caring Mother trying to help her little daughter through the divorce. [pv] She, or more likely her asst, slapped that together, placed stickers strategically, used it for the scenes with the quack, then tossed it in the recycle bin! (You do recycle in Cali, don't ya??)

Now, regarding the pics of Kim at the table during Tay Tay's BS session with the ladies, I didn't remember seeing her there when I originally watched. Just re-watched that part at my daughters and, sure enough, Kim is there between Adrienne and Camille. And she's there until sometime after Adrienne confronts Tay Tay. That's when Bravo starts going to the shots of Kim camping out in the Bathroom. Damn, I would love to know what words went with that finger pointing!

LOLABINGO

[-]

Posts: 20675

(01/17/12 08:55 PM)

Me too Brook!

Another pretty good recap:

http://latimesblogs.latim...laining-ceaselessly.html

Gawker so far has some lame shit about Who Would You Fuck. I hope the real recap shows up soon.

Last Edited By: LOLABINGO 01/17/12 09:21 PM. Edited 1 times.

ImCrushingYourHead

[-]

Posts: 10061

(01/17/12 10:49 PM)

Registered user

bklynMaggs wrote:
Now, regarding the pics of Kim at the table during Tay Tay's BS session with the ladies, I didn't remember seeing her there when I originally watched. Just re-watched that part at my daughters and, sure enough, Kim is there between Adrienne and Camille. And she's there until sometime after Adrienne confronts Tay Tay.

It's just like the missing leprechaun puzzle! /obscure but apt reference, I swear! Anyone, anyone?

Haven't been able to read all the recaps yet, but wow. Bravo really stacked the deck at that Sur opening, eh?

An ex-girlfriend (Paul's)
a mistress of an ex-husband (waitress)
an ex-houseguest (cedric)
a resentful chef (chef)
a soon to be ex-therapist (I hope!!!!)

Who am I forgetting? They had to throw every possible antagonist into that fake-assed evening. They must've been nervous that the final gathering would be a dud.

And I agree with connie & brooklyn: Taylor doesn't give an ounce of botox for her daughter. The chart's age-inappropriateness reeks of total alienation from her daughter.

Jassyca

[-]

Posts: 1754

(01/17/12 11:40 PM)

Registered User

Mrs Krista Boogie wrote:
Having a visual reward system for your kid is pretty common. My problem with it is that it was just an opportunity for Taylor to present herself as a parent who gives a shit about her kid. She's all about the visible display--ridiculous parties, outrageous age inappropriate gifts, and lip service. Only a person who has no knowledge of kids would even make a list that long. You pick the top five issues that are actually problems and start there. If I was Kennedy I'd have zoned out by "sit with feet on the floor."

I don't know of one human being who would continue for a second being on a show like this after her husband, the father of her FIVE year old committed suicide. Even if she hated him, taking care of her kid would be the only choice to any normal mother. And it's pretty obvious that traveling, partying, and going on talk shows takes you away from that little girl. Taylor's such a despicable narcissist it's no wonder all this is happening.

I also have a feeling that Taylor's been in many fights in her day and that there's high likelihood that her bruised eye was the result of "going Oklahoma" on Russell's ass, not the other way around.

Traylor did say she was in a "physically abusive relationship".. she just neglected to mention SHE was the abuseR.

bklynMaggs

[-]

Posts: 2686

(01/17/12 11:44 PM)

Hey Crush - ya know I had to google the leprechaun puzzle, and you're spot on.   Kim was totally the 15th Leprechaun. She was sitting there and sitting there, then at one point she was sitting across the bench seat, the wham-o, the next thing ya know she's in ~~her drug den~~ the ladies room! And there's only 14 (or maybe 5) hoes left at the table!

And you're so right about the antagonist thing.   I could see the waitress thing slipping by, but Paul's ex-gf?!?!   Why didn't they just bring in Tommy Howell and (Pumice) Ken's soon to be ex-wife. Throw in a couple of Lisa's Ken's favorite escorts for good measure!
This kinda indicates to me that Bravo has lost confidence in Tay Tay as an antagonist.

I also read Dana/Pam's blog today which just reeked of her trying to be relevant. But I couldn't help but wonder.   Does it piss Pam/Dana off more when she's not invited to an event or when she's there and is just one of the passing party-goers????

Pumpkin37

[-]

Posts: 4970

(01/18/12 12:06 AM)

Registered User

ImCrushingYourHead wrote:
And I agree with connie & brooklyn: Taylor doesn't give an ounce of botox for her daughter. The chart's age-inappropriateness reeks of total alienation from her daughter.

Me too. I have a child that age and would never impose that many responsibilities on him/her. Like someone else stated, you set maybe 3 or so goals, that is outrageous. My kid also needs help in the bath and getting to bed, I guess Taylor is aiming to have the kid out on her own by age 10.

ImCrushingYourHead

[-]

Posts: 10062

(01/18/12 12:08 AM)

Registered user

Brooklyn - thank you for looking up the leprechaun puzzle! Almost worth it, right?

Before the internet gave away the answer, it drove many a good person to distraction. But the editing out of Kim in that scene begs so many questions!

I think a glutton for attention like Pam really thought her "This cost a million dollars!" schtick was really going to catapult her to stardom. I'm so glad it didn't.

And I made the mistake of watching an episode of Intervention right before this recent RHBH episode. I had thought Brandi's meth accusation was sort of a general 'Kim's on drugs' kind of comment ... until I saw the characteristics of this particular meth-head. The only difference I could see between the slurry, flighty, skinny meth addict featured on Intervention and Kim is about 20 thousand a month in alimony.

Pumpkin37

[-]

Posts: 4971

(01/18/12 12:13 AM)

Registered User

ImCrushingYourHead wrote:
And I made the mistake of watching an episode of Intervention right before this recent RHBH episode. I had thought Brandi's meth accusation was sort of a general 'Kim's on drugs' kind of comment ... until I saw the characteristics of this particular meth-head. The only difference I could see between the slurry, flighty, skinny meth addict featured on Intervention and Kim is about 20 thousand a month in alimony.

Totally. Kim somehow manages to look kinda put together, but all the other signs are there. I don't think there's any hope for her.

Jassyca

[-]

Posts: 1755

(01/18/12 12:18 AM)

Registered User

LOLABINGO wrote:
Posted with permission from the creator of this, it's easier to visualize the timeline for me with this.

I read that as:

Sunday	Monday	Tuesday	Wednesday	Thursday	Friday	Saturday
Party	Aonhtre Praty (hic!)	Praryt! HooWoo! WhoHoo! Whoever!	At home bored	Party!	Bored again	Party!!
Bored out of my fuckin' skull coz “I took the week off” to spend it with mom and whats-her-name (what the fuck was I thinking?)
Party!	Bored	Party!	Aonthre pAryt!1! Woo!	Recover from Hangover	Party!	Home (drat)

If that fucks up the margins, I apologize. My point was: when the hell is the bitch ever HOME? I was just being snide when I mentioned "days ending in 'Y'" but, shit, that's damn near the truth.

Of course Traylor wanted Russell to "co-parent". In her eyes that meant "free babysitter on nights I wanna party it up".

Pumpkin37

[-]

Posts: 4973

(01/18/12 12:25 AM)

Registered User

There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.
Remove this ad

zippityboomboom wrote:
Connie Sewer wrote:

zippityboomboom wrote:
Oh give me a break. I know a lot of people who give their toddlers M&Ms for peeing/pooping in the toilet. Elementary school children get conduct cards where if they have good behavior and turn in their homework, they get a small prize at the end of the week. Incentives work for children. It gives them a goal, a means to reach it, and a way to document it.

I agree about the potty training, but Kennedy is five years old now, long past potty training. Taylor would never, ever give Kennedy m&ms for a "reward", she might get fat, and that would never do for Taylor's self image.

Anybody that read the chart and thinks it was healthy for a five year old child, is just misinformed. It was detached and self serving in it's entirety, and not motivated by a truly caring mother.

I'm pretty much informed that you're a humorless, know-it-all harpy.

Connie is awesome, you are missing the point. A little reward chart is fine; having one THAT LONG with ridiculous things on it (don't talk to mom while she's on the phone?) is what the problem is.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Real H'wives of Beverly Hills: We're Not Buyin' It, Taylor

Ken and Kim on the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills are a psa on not doing drugs.