Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV in Lions, Tigers, Survivors

0 Points

Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV

Started By	Comment
greenpensil	Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV	Lead	[-]
Posts: 13 (01/28/12 07:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad Personally i think Russell should have won the season. He had control of everything that happened in the camp, plus he made the biggest and best blindside ever by voting off Tyson. Parvati tried to undermine Russells leadership by not telling him about the Hidden Immunity Idol that she found but that didn't do anything for her. Because of that Russell was going to vote her off by voting with Rupert and Colby but she won Immunity so he couldn't do that. She just got lucky with the Individual Challenges and she always won them when she was in danger. Plus many people say that Parvati dominated the challenges but she only won 1 more Immunity Idols than Russell. So bring on the reasons why Parvati should have won this season but not Russell.
cx		#1	[-]
Posts: 3261 (01/28/12 07:26 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	LURK MOAR
DragonSlayerCoach		#2	[-]
Posts: 2749 (01/28/12 07:27 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	You're as dumb as Jason Siska.
Ginger ale		#3	[-]
Posts: 823 (01/28/12 07:27 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Troll.
PoorYorick		#4	[-]
Posts: 251 (01/28/12 07:32 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts
ElisabethHasselback42		#5	[-]
Posts: 5067 (01/28/12 07:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Russell is just too amazing for them to handle. Hater juries!
TRAINROBBER	Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV	#6	[-]
Posts: 2104 (01/28/12 07:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Because people are delusional...
greenpensil		#7	[-]
Posts: 14 (01/28/12 07:35 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	TRAINROBBER wrote: Because people are delusional... Talking about Coach?
RobVanStratus		#8	[-]
Posts: 10943 (01/28/12 07:39 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Neither Parvati or Russell deserved to win HvV. They both spent most of the post-merge game in a pissing match, seeing who could one-up the other one at the expense of other players. This left them blinded to the fact that they were in a situation at the F7 where they NEEDED to stick together and keep Danielle, who was the best jury goat out there and instead they fought and Russell helped vote her off! After that, they were both screwed in terms of winning. Whoever they got to the F3 with them was destined to win because they were either a Hero (Colby/Rupert), a honorary Hero (Sandra for constantly trying to undermine the Villains and save the Heroes), or actually was playing a solid game (Jerri). The two of them spent too much time when the jury started trying to outplay each other and forgot that there were 10 other people that would either make the jury or the finals with them and couldn't focus on getting their goats to the end. Had they buckled down and even voted off Rupert instead of Candice, that would have left them with two goats at the end to drag along and if they could have made the F6 with Jerri/Candice/Sandra/Danielle and themselves, they'd just need to get rid of Jerri/Sandra and they would have it made.
ilovekelly752		#9	[-]
Posts: 346 (01/28/12 07:57 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	My thought proccess. reads title Wow, someone is acknowledging that the right person wins. reads first sentence
ilovekelly752		#10	[-]
Posts: 347 (01/28/12 07:59 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad Sandra's game > Parvati's game >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell's game
ilovekelly752		#11	[-]
Posts: 348 (01/28/12 08:04 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	greenpensil wrote: She just got lucky with the Individual Challenges and she always won them when she was in danger. LOL If you actually believe that. They were voting her out at 8,6, and 5, but not 7 or 4.
dabu		#12	[-]
Posts: 1501 (01/28/12 08:07 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Lurk moar, obvious troll is obvious etc. But as far as the question in the title, I have no idea. Parvati's game wasn't good at all. The only good move she made was at the F10 with the Idols, but even that was done poorly because she had the smug as fuck attitude while playing them and only happened as a result of a huge mistake she made (she only had two Idols because she hadn't told Russell about her first one, which served no strategic purpose whatsoever)
greenpensil		#13	[-]
Posts: 15 (01/28/12 08:14 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	dabu wrote: Lurk moar, obvious troll is obvious etc. But as far as the question in the title, I have no idea. Parvati's game wasn't good at all. The only good move she made was at the F10 with the Idols, but even that was done poorly because she had the smug as fuck attitude while playing them and only happened as a result of a huge mistake she made (she only had two Idols because she hadn't told Russell about her first one, which served no strategic purpose whatsoever) How come everybody thinks that Parvati's double idol blindside is better than Russells on Tyson?? Parvati had 2 hidden immunity idols and the numbers were even 5 vs 5. Even if the Heroes would have voted for Parvati it would have been tie, and then tie again. So they would have to draw rocks and the since Danielle won immunity and Sandra and Jerri had Hidden Immunity Idol, and Parvati wouldn't be in danger if they would draw rocks. So the only Villain in danger was Russell. And the odds on hero would go home was 4/5. It's impressive to use 2 Hidden Immunity Idols in 1 tribal council but this blindside is very overrated. While Russell put his own butt by giving Parvati the Hidden Immunity Idol and voting out Tyson. So Russell made bigger moves in this game.
greenpensil		#14	[-]
Posts: 16 (01/28/12 08:15 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	greenpensil wrote: dabu wrote: Lurk moar, obvious troll is obvious etc. But as far as the question in the title, I have no idea. Parvati's game wasn't good at all. The only good move she made was at the F10 with the Idols, but even that was done poorly because she had the smug as fuck attitude while playing them and only happened as a result of a huge mistake she made (she only had two Idols because she hadn't told Russell about her first one, which served no strategic purpose whatsoever) How come everybody thinks that Parvati's double idol blindside is better than Russells on Tyson?? Parvati had 2 hidden immunity idols and the numbers were even 5 vs 5. Even if the Heroes would have voted for Parvati it would have been tie, and then tie again. So they would have to draw rocks and the since Danielle won immunity and Sandra and Jerri had Hidden Immunity Idol, and Parvati wouldn't be in danger if they would draw rocks. So the only Villain in danger was Russell. And the odds on hero would go home was 4/5. It's impressive to use 2 Hidden Immunity Idols in 1 tribal council but this blindside is very overrated. While Russell put his own butt by giving Parvati the Hidden Immunity Idol and voting out Tyson. So Russell made much bigger moves in this game.
ElisabethNelehHeidiRok		#15	[-]
Posts: 2372 (01/28/12 08:20 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Parvati made bigger moves than Russell in HvV....she controlled Russell. Either way neither Sandra nor Russell should have won that game. Parvati was the ONLY option of a good player to make it to the finals that season.
greenpensil		#16	[-]
Posts: 17 (01/28/12 08:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ElisabethNelehHeidiRok wrote: Parvati made bigger moves than Russell in HvV....she controlled Russell. Either way neither Sandra nor Russell should have won that game. Parvati was the ONLY option of a good player to make it to the finals that season. Why do you say than Parvati controlled Russell?
dabu		#17	[-]
Posts: 1504 (01/28/12 08:28 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	greenpensil wrote: dabu wrote: Lurk moar, obvious troll is obvious etc. But as far as the question in the title, I have no idea. Parvati's game wasn't good at all. The only good move she made was at the F10 with the Idols, but even that was done poorly because she had the smug as fuck attitude while playing them and only happened as a result of a huge mistake she made (she only had two Idols because she hadn't told Russell about her first one, which served no strategic purpose whatsoever) How come everybody thinks that Parvati's double idol blindside is better than Russells on Tyson?? Parvati had 2 hidden immunity idols and the numbers were even 5 vs 5. Even if the Heroes would have voted for Parvati it would have been tie, and then tie again. So they would have to draw rocks and the since Danielle won immunity and Sandra and Jerri had Hidden Immunity Idol, and Parvati wouldn't be in danger if they would draw rocks. So the only Villain in danger was Russell. And the odds on hero would go home was 4/5. It's impressive to use 2 Hidden Immunity Idols in 1 tribal council but this blindside is very overrated. While Russell put his own butt by giving Parvati the Hidden Immunity Idol and voting out Tyson. So Russell made bigger moves in this game. HA HA HA WOW HE'S PRETENDING TO BE A RUSSELL FAN TO TROLL I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE IN MY LIFE no but for real gtfo
a hot pickle		#18	[-]
Posts: 29 (01/28/12 08:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	So, I'm going to answer the question you posed whilst ignoring the godawful explanation you included because you're clearly a moron :- * Overall, I think Parvati played the best game throughout the season and controlled Russell. * Sandra's overall game was tremendously hit or miss and relied a lot on luck and the stupidity of other players. * That being said, she deserved the win because the majority of voters in that particular jury voted for her, end of. * The reason Parvati didn't deserve to win is solely because she let Sandra make it to the FTC over Jerri. There were a couple of different ways to attempt this, the best being to force a tie with Jerri and let it go to fire-making. Doesn't guarentee a win but increases her odds. There's still a good chance she lost the game once Danielle gallopped out of the game. * Parvati's jury management with several players was clearly supbar. Mostly JT, Amanda and Candice. Who knows what really went on behind the scenes, but clearly the former two in particular felt very strongly about NOT voting for her, no matter what. There's a bazillion other reasons, but that's a good start. I'd like to point out the Parvati is easily my favourite player of all time too, as well as maybe the best. If I were on that jury I would have voted for her over Sandra any day of the week, but there were definitely holes in her endgame. Still a spectacular game though and still one of the results that will always bug me the most.
Yeaster		#19	[-]
Posts: 11452 (01/28/12 08:41 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Russell should have won Borneo. Russell should be president of the United States.
linesinaconversation		#20	[-]
Posts: 7611 (01/28/12 09:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	A tree never hits an automobile except in self-defence. Remove this ad I'm getting really sick of these June 2010 wormholes... ...wait, you mean this was posted today?!

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV

Why do people say that Parvati should have won HvV