Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 2565
02/26/12 04:39 PM
Registered User
Sav wrote:from cbs.com facebook commenters :Big mistake, voting out Tina. What this tribe needs is level heads, people who can govern their emotions, and some maturity. I think the real problem comes with swearing loyalty to people 5 minutes after meeting them--how can you know with whom you should ally? It's absurd. And then to continue to be loyal just because in the first moments of excitement you made agreements with people who really aren't up to being there just compounds the error. "Oh! We're all cute and 20! We should be in an alliance!" isn't exactly brilliant strategy.
Posts: 13703
02/26/12 07:19 PM
Posts: 9693
02/26/12 08:49 PM
Registered user
survivorisdestiny wrote: Sav wrote: from cbs.com facebook commenters : Big mistake, voting out Tina. What this tribe needs is level heads, people who can govern their emotions, and some maturity. I think the real problem comes with swearing loyalty to people 5 minutes after meeting them--how can you know with whom you should ally? It's absurd. And then to continue to be loyal just because in the first moments of excitement you made agreements with people who really aren't up to being there just compounds the error. "Oh! We're all cute and 20! We should be in an alliance!" isn't exactly brilliant strategy. Tina? Two other Tinas were voted out first but this is just plain stupid. "Tina" had five confessionals and they still didn't pick up on her name?
Sav wrote: from cbs.com facebook commenters : Big mistake, voting out Tina. What this tribe needs is level heads, people who can govern their emotions, and some maturity. I think the real problem comes with swearing loyalty to people 5 minutes after meeting them--how can you know with whom you should ally? It's absurd. And then to continue to be loyal just because in the first moments of excitement you made agreements with people who really aren't up to being there just compounds the error. "Oh! We're all cute and 20! We should be in an alliance!" isn't exactly brilliant strategy.
Posts: 12588
02/26/12 08:56 PM
Posts: 32432
02/27/12 06:10 AM
TheEasyOne wrote:it's episode 2 and it's too early to tell if a season is good or bad.
Posts: 1414
03/01/12 12:29 PM
Posts: 3540
03/01/12 01:10 PM
Posts: 1
03/01/12 01:39 PM
03/01/12 09:43 PM
Posts: 2516
03/01/12 09:54 PM
Posts: 7702
03/02/12 03:36 PM
Posts: 344
03/03/12 08:56 PM
emoch wrote: It's when the core viewers stop tuning in and we get the ratings nearer to 10 million than 20 that we might wanna start worrying. But "Survivor" is still a money maker for CBS either way...and relatively inexpensive.
Posts: 7561
03/03/12 09:51 PM
MESS member
03/08/12 11:43 AM
03/08/12 11:47 AM
Posts: 13858
03/08/12 12:46 PM
03/08/12 03:00 PM
Posts: 1571
03/08/12 03:47 PM
03/08/12 04:09 PM
03/08/12 06:12 PM
Share This Link