Coachocd wrote:
Trixiego wrote:
Not sure if this was posted or not but in the even of a tie at the AHEM, final two..........
Reality TV World: Did Survivor host Jeff Probst ever explain what would have happened if there'd been a 4-4 jury vote tie? If so, what was the answer?
Amanda: No, he didn't ever tell us. There was a white envelope. I don't know what was in it, but that was supposed to be the tie-breaker if there was one. But I have no idea. I know as much about it as you do.
This is caca. The game should have clearly defined rules. If there is a tie jury, which there shouldn't be because there should be an odd-numbered jury facing a final 2.
I don't like how producer changed the rules as they want. I know that it's supposed to be "Do not make assumptions" but my guess is they plan for final 3, but james' injury screw their schedule. and then they said fuck it. let make the finale final 2.
Same thing happen with cook island. they planned for final 2 (that's why the hidden idol rule said the idol can be used until final 4) but i guess in the middle they decides to make it final 3.
