Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 95
(05/18/08 09:43 PM)
Registered user
mtj1282 wrote: PJMichaelangelo wrote: colorofcoils wrote: >Chet was a better player than Joel Correct, because he placed better than him. Just because Joel played a threatening game, doesn't mean he played a good game. Wow. That one statement alone destroys any and all credibility you may have had. a n00b with only 94 posts is talking about credibility?
PJMichaelangelo wrote: colorofcoils wrote: >Chet was a better player than Joel Correct, because he placed better than him. Just because Joel played a threatening game, doesn't mean he played a good game. Wow. That one statement alone destroys any and all credibility you may have had.
colorofcoils wrote: >Chet was a better player than Joel Correct, because he placed better than him. Just because Joel played a threatening game, doesn't mean he played a good game.
>Chet was a better player than Joel Correct, because he placed better than him. Just because Joel played a threatening game, doesn't mean he played a good game.
Wow. That one statement alone destroys any and all credibility you may have had.
a n00b with only 94 posts is talking about credibility?
A guy who used to write for Murtz is talking about credibility. And you're the proof that number of posts has zero relationship with credibility, intelligence, or good looks.
Share This Link