Can we please retire the "He/She won because the others sucked" bullshit argument? Survivor is all about adaptation, if you are up against dumbasses and use it fully to your advantage, than you deserved to win just as much as any other winner. And I also despise the subsequent "If He/She was in any other season, they would've lost" argument. Maybe but they weren't. They landed on a particular season, there's no need for shoulda woulda coulda, it happened the way it happened. Tom used the alpha dad who leads his tribe to victory strategy on his season and it worked. Morasca and Parvati used the highschool clique strategy in their season and it worked, Amber used the hide behind the annoying douche bag who does all the dirty work on her season and it worked. All the winners used their particular strenghts and abilities in their season and it turned out to be the winning recipe. Some were lucky, others had it in the bag from day 1. It turned out that way, you can't change history, so deal with it. Enough with the [insert random winner] didn't deserve it as much as the others because of [insert pointless argument]