Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
That completely would undermine the concept(If a non winner is a better player then the winner). You're undermining Tina's social game. She was more respected then Colby because she made all of the decisions. Only two people on the jury voted for Colby because they truly considered him the better player(Amber voted somewhat out of spite).

And off topic, the Onions on the Gabon jury had a legitimate beef with Sugar for her poor social game. It makes no difference how influential she was, EVERYONE was trying to use her as a goat for the final 3.
I'm not undermining anybody. I didn't say Colby's game was better than Tina's, and winning doesn't mean her social or strategic game was better than Colby's. All I am saying is that she rode coattails because Colby did all the major work for her. Fact.