interesting news about controversial decision in Survivor Spoilers Forum

0 Points

New Poll

interesting news about controversial decision

Started By	Comment
Donovan108	interesting news about controversial decision	Lead	[-]
Posts: 3 01/01/07 07:01 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	hey all, I was reading an article and it seemed to agree with possible speculation that someone does not vote for a winner. Read it. I hope this helps fule more discussion. www.realitytvmagazine.com....html#more denny
	Remove this ad
survivorfreak10	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#1	[-]
Posts: 4 01/03/07 08:48 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	After looking at the article, I can't find any hints that a person doesn't decide to vote for a winner. Just wondering, where did you get that impression?
burtonsfan	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#2	[-]
Posts: 123 01/06/07 10:02 AM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	But they said Survivor 15 will probably be The out-casts Revisited [quote]It would be nice to bring back players like Wanda and Jonathan,and the others that got voted off and didn't get to play very long.It could be called "The out-casts Revisited" it could be season 15.[/quote
ChefMobie	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#3	[-]
Posts: 130 01/06/07 01:58 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Burtonsfan, that was actually a comment by one of the readers. So, it's just an opinion.
agent2424	//	#4	[-]
Posts: 8415 01/06/07 02:16 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	WHAT! so let me get this straight the out-cast season 15 one... lol if that woudl ever happen the season WOULD SUCK! here are our tribes.. Harlagalozors tribe which will always wear fusicia consists of: BB Anderson - Previously on Survivor Borneo.. voted out 2nd Debb Eaton - Previously on survivor Austrialia.. Voted out 1st Carl Bilacoin - previously on survivor Africa.. Voted out 3rd Sarah Jones - previously on survivor Marqases. Voetd out 4th Jed Hidlebird - previoulsy on survivor THailand. Voted out 3rd Nicole Delma - previouly on survivor panama.. Voted out 1st Ryan Aiken - previously on survivor amazon... voted out 1st Dolly nele - prevououlsy on survivor Vanavatu .voted out 1st Jonathon libby - previously on survivor palau .. 1/2 out Briana .,.. - previulsy on survivor guatamala.. voted out 3rd The oulamozers tribe which will always wear turquoise consists of: ............... k i'm bored now but see it'll make a stupid season
Wickershamb	Re: //	#5	[-]
Posts: 447 01/06/07 02:21 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Dolly was voted out second, and secondly there is already ANOTHER thread where people post endlessly about which all stars/second chance people they want on the show. It's really quite enthralling.
WylDawg	Re: //	#6	[-]
Posts: 29186 01/06/07 05:36 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	*Quote:* Even though thousands apply to be a contestant each season on the show, because of the racial twist this season, the producers recruited people. Were not afraid to recruit people, Probst said. There's an under-statement.
irked penguin	Re: //	#7	[-]
Posts: 22 01/07/07 07:41 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	*Quote:* This isnt the only major thing Fijis season will deliver. One of the biggest decisions thats ever had to be made on our show gets made late into the season and its controversial, he said. And it will definitely have Survivor fans on one side of the fence or the other. There will be no neutral on it. You will think this decision was the right one or the wrong one. It would seem that refusing to vote to a winner would make sense if it happened late into the season. Though I can't see how fans would be on one side or another. The fact that it says "...HAD to be made" makes me think that it involves a twist the producers came up with. Perhaps someone chooses whether or not to permanatly exile someone or bring back an outcast tribe?
.	Re: //	#8	[-]
Posts: 13128 01/07/07 07:45 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I don't really think reacting to a producer-created twist would be super-controversial. It'd spark discussion like Cindy and the car thing but it wouldn't really be controversial. And not voting is actually against the rules, so if anyone did that, it wouldn't be controversial, it'd be simply idiotic and we'd all call them out for being extreme dumbasses.
Alffmix	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#9	[-]
Posts: 6803 01/07/07 08:45 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	If someone doesn't want to vote at f2, then the f2 must SUCK ASS !!!
PrettyGoodYear1988	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#10	[-]
Posts: 9680 01/07/07 10:08 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Responding to a producer-created twist is not controversial. It's part of the game. I am definitely on the Survivor choosing to stay despite a family emergency bandwagon. It makes sense that one could choose to do this if it was late in the game and they felt they had an honest shot at winning. And it would also be controversial. Myself, I would never stay in the game if there was someone dead or dying back home, even if it was Day 37 and I had the HII.
	Remove this ad
Alffmix	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#11	[-]
Posts: 6803 01/08/07 01:43 AM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	*Quote:* Responding to a producer-created twist is not controversial. It's part of the game. I am definitely on the Survivor choosing to stay despite a family emergency bandwagon. It makes sense that one could choose to do this if it was late in the game and they felt they had an honest shot at winning. And it would also be controversial. Myself, I would never stay in the game if there was someone dead or dying back home, even if it was Day 37 and I had the HII. Maybe not my dying fiancée, but for someone dead, why would you come back?? Day freakin' 37 !
moovivor	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#12	[-]
Posts: 8513 01/08/07 02:22 AM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Seriously... I mean, if they weren't dead and you had five days with them before they died, I would leave ASAP. But if they're already dead and there's nothing you can do about it...
Joss Wolfe	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#13	[-]
Posts: 1215 01/08/07 02:59 AM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	note: you all are idiots. have a great day
denanabenana	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#14	[-]
Posts: 111 01/09/07 10:31 AM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	How would they know if someone was dead or dying? The producers aren't allowed to tell them anything. Jeffy had no idea JFP's gramma wasn't dead and JennaM left with a gut feeling about her mom.
Addicted2Survivor	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#15	[-]
Posts: 401 01/09/07 02:14 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	*Quote:* JennaM left with a gut feeling about her mom. i still have a feeling someone told her. maybe she really did have a gut feeling, but my gut feeling tells me someone tipped her off.
gmrose	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#16	[-]
Posts: 915 01/09/07 05:38 PM MESS member Reply Quote More Recent Posts	She was definitely tipped off. Having a gut feeling is the same as having a spiritual guide. Anyone who says that they believe this is either a liar or a fool. That stuff is all just make-believe.
DavidV	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#17	[-]
Posts: 473 01/09/07 07:58 PM Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	They have an emergency number to call CBS with. However, CBS uses discretion with this in how a "survivor" is contacted. A freind of mine was friends with Kim from S3 and a simlar question was asked of her by my friend. If for some sad reason an immediate family member (wife, mom, child etc. was seriously injured, dying etc. CBS would be notified about it and they would discretely let the "survivor" know about it whiel filming. You do sign a contract about certain things but CBS...believe it or not...does have a heart. DAvidV.
jgabler	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#18	[-]
Posts: 5024 01/10/07 09:52 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Odd, because Brandon from the same season said he was told to say goodbye to anyone he thought may die during filming, because if they did, they wouldn't know about it until they were out of the game. Since Brandon made the jury, he was technically in the game. Of course Tanya from Thailand wasn't still involved, so she was able to leave. It's supposed to happen late in the game, so that could mean around Day 30 when the loved ones usually show up. Maybe one survivor's loved one doesn't show up, or someone else shows up and tells them what's happened. For it to be considered contraversial, the survivor probably decides to stay in the game.
survivor300	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#19	[-]
Posts: 3975 01/11/07 01:24 PM Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Very interesting. that is all
Backupforgrabs	Re: interesting news about controversial decision	#20	[-]
Posts: 939 01/11/07 05:29 PM MESS member Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Every season has ' The most shocking tribal council!' or 'The biggest twist ever!' I think it is probably a lot of hype. I don't think they would promote someone dying as the highlight of the show. They didn't when Jenna left ASS . Since it is late in the game it leads me to believe it's probably something like a player winning a secret reward challenge and the reward is getting to see a family member and no one else gets to see theirs, or he/she can not see the family member but all the others get to see theirs. Or maybe they bring back the car give-away winner gets one, or everybody else gets one.
	Remove this ad

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

interesting news about controversial decision

interesting news about controversial decision