ArtieeLange1 wrote:
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
If a strongman isn't cunning or lucky enough to mitigate the effects of an evil fascist like Chet, he should have played better.
Again you miss the whole point, which is that "playing better" is not what determines a players status, it is the good luck or bad luck of being randomly forced onto specific team.
Again, the game post-merge will find the better players, but the problem is by the time that happens, the best players have most likely been voted off by a half-assed "two team" system that does not favor those who "played better", but simply those who outnumber those who "played better".
Why do you assume that the stronger players are better? Cirie proved that wrong twice. Anyway, all of the competitions will have some who are better at it than others, and what order these challenges appear in will heavily weigh the odds in someones favor,just like tribal pre selection does. If one persons a good archer but a bad balencer,they go home if a beam challenge comes first. Also, your theory about the strong ALWAYS voting out threats pre merge is wrong.When that did happen,they were isolated incidents.And Doc,I think this nefarious character works for Mark Burnett himself!
Again your statements manage to be both inaccurate 
