| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
doc |
|||
|
A couple of pages ago he was saying how Moment of Truth was going to beat Survivor. A TV show with no soul and no legs going to beat the king.
|
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
|
sTarT cYcle
sTarT cYcle
... |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: Um...American Idol DOES technically have two "teams" for the first three voting episodes. |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: Way to miss the point (for the 25th time).
|
|||
GnarlsInCharge |
|||
|
I think he is real and believes his ideals as wacky and far fetched as they seem to the rest of us.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: Moment of Truth did beat Survivor, stupid.
Next, they are putting "Hell's Kitchen" against Survivor. Hells Kitchen suffers none of the stigma of Survivor, which left a bad taste in
about 8 million ex-viewers who are bored of the weaklings who get to bypass the threats because of the half-assed "team" portion of the rules.
Weaklings don't get by in Hells Kitchen.
"It's eroding! It's an older show. Its eventually going to give up and were trying to accelerate that." - Fox entertainment chair Peter Liguori Prove Peter right by changing nothing, listen to scared little bitch-fans like "doc" and the rest of them who don't realize the show lost 8
million viewers in the past six seasons.
|
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: You mean I'm NOT supposed to take arguments out of context and completely ignore the rest of a post? |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:
You can do whatever you want, but when you compare the team-system of Survivor, where they vote eachother off, to the "teams" of American Idol,
where they are simple groupings that have no effect on each individual, then you have once again missed the point. (Now for the 26th time, which officially
makes you a retarded individual.)
|
|||
SFC |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: Jen is in the Final 4 over Bobby who was much stronger
|
|||
doc |
|||
|
YA, Ramsay always let's few weakies through, maybe not to win, but for ratings. and The Apprentice does it also. They are 2 shows that should have no
excuse. I Remembe one season of the apprentice, the final 2 came to a girl and a guy. Thw guy had an amzing resume. A law degree and a MBA and I think he
was an army ranger or navy seal, he didn't make mistakes, he should of boqwn her away. Instead Trump made a bid deal about it, syaing it's close a nd
a real tough decision when it really shouldn't hav been, but he's going for ratings. I Think HK has ran it's coarse. How many times can you
listen to GR call someone a donkey befoe it gets boring?
MOT beat Survivor on a Wendsday for an ep that alot of poeple missed. I tuned in during the reward challenge. I know thy do it evry year at that time and I still Forgot about it. MOT is a wicked show, has no future, shouldn't even be on ethe air, but it's Fox and they have no soul, just like their boss. It amazes me, you have no problem with that show but you have a roblem with what parvati did to James. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: Well, at least I don't miss the point of MULTIPLE individuals, and at least I'm...you know...right. |
|||
doc |
|||
|
I love how you keep throwing around the word retard, when you can't even grasp a simple concept from Survivor 101 that any 8 year old could grasp, that
premerge you keep strength, post merge strength becomes a target. There are exceptions, like on the only 2 eps you watched. Guessing they were Aaron's
boot in China and Joel's in Micronesia. Watch some more eps and you'll see them booting the weak and the sick and people who are blamed for losing
challenges. This goes back to Borneo, when most players were pretty bad, they still understood this. And BTW, when I Say strength, I mean just not muscles,
I'm talking all around strength, including mental.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: Right, thats how the bimbo crew managed to get by, with its leader Parvati doing absolutely nothing for the "team".
Because she doesn't have to do anything for the "team".
Because the "team" is fake, and everyone knows it you show any strength, youre gonna get cut. The exact opposite of how it should be, like in the
meritocratic post-merge segment.
|
|||
kenc333 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: Just because she's a woman, or that her whole alliance was female doesn't mean that they were weak. They kept up in the challenges both physically and mentally, and if you think that as a 'weak' player, she should've left early, then she should get more credit for playing strategically enough to stay to the end. And I don't like Parvati, but by no means did she do nothing for her tribe or herself. |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
|
Ken, don't feed it. I won't allow you. <3
|
|||
doc |
|||
|
Artie, ur fucking insane. I hope you try out for and make it on Survivor. I want o see everyone reaction when you tell your teammates you should get rid of
someone like Ozzy because the system is "broken" it's the right thing to do. You'll take Erik's crown. You'll probably get on other
reality shows. Everyone will be after the moron who can't understand a simple Survivor concept.
Parvati played the gamw perfectly. Play on people's emotions but don't get emotional yourself. SHE knew on day 1, she'd have to back stab Ozzy and James. And if those 2 guys are too stupid to realize thatt 2 +2 does not equal 3, that's their own fault. Rob and Amber said they always wondered if they were being played by the other. Are you ever going to give examples showing your claims? Or show in your system why the stromgest of the loser group would not get booted? Or who under ur system will make F4 or F5 in any season? |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: I would be the one they would target, because im the threat that would destroy them in individual immunity. So my optimal strategy would be to hide the
Alpha and bond with losers bimbos hippos and homos, Clark Kent-style.
doc wrote: Thats a fact. Lets look at some other facts: 1) The way she played perfectly was bonding with other losers like her on the first day of the game, and using the team-segment to vote off everyone else.
2) Parvati is weak and kinda dumb. That she can win is why the show loses about a million viewers per season.
3) The only reason she got a second chance (failed the first time) is because she has a hot body and likes to show it off. And she wins, its like the show
has turned into Americas Top Model |
|||
TW4Life |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote:
TW After Life wrote: lol |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
kenc333 wrote: "playing strategically" = bonding with other losers on the very first day of the game, and using the team-segment to vote off threats
zzzzzzzzzz = the show loses about a million viewers per season.
|
|||
kenc333 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: Funny that the losers she bonded with on the first days ended up in the final 3, isn't it? Last time I checked, losers didn't outlast the
'winners'
|
|||