MMan9000 wrote:I actually agree with you. I don't think Cirie has really made a lot of promises in this game....She did make a promise to Jason..But that's about it. When she went against her previous alliance before merge, she was honest about that as well. LOL! It seems like Cirie was setting up Amanda/Pavarti to do her dirty work, make the promises and break them to James/Ozzy. So they would be the bad guys to the jury...However, she kind of made a mistake when she let Amanda out of it. Because now Amanda's hands are clean.
I always assumed that it is because of the fact that Cirie made the alliance with Parvati and Amanda in the early parts of the game. She doesn't want to do the same thing as Parvati and betray the two of them. It could cost her the game, and make Natalie (assuming Amanda is the target) look better. Sure, she hasn't gotten any airtime, but I don't think that they would care if it came down to who played the honest game.
The only person Natalie screwed over is Jason, while Cirie and Parvati have screwed over James, Ozzy, Jason, perhaps Alexis, and maybe Amanda. Ozzy seems particularly bitter, it might just be me, but I don't think flipping people off means that he likes you.
However, it seems confirmed that the Final Three are Amanda, Parvati, and Cirie.
Honsetly, if there is one Survivor whose strategy I'd really like to talk to it's Amanda. I wonder if she would or wouldn't have gone against James/Ozzy. If her goal was to let Pavarti/Cirie take them out for her, while not betraying them herself. I'm very curious. But I wonder if as long as she's dating Ozzy, if she'll ever admit things. It's interesting though becaude Ozzy said in an Interview that Amanda never mentioned Pavarti's double dealings LOL.












