Survivor Fever Bootsheet

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
SurvivorFanGP		#1721	[-]
Posts: 5629 (03/20/08 7:09 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Spare the fantard wars, please.
kdo2		#1722	[-]
Posts: 325 (03/20/08 9:04 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Cole wrote: jessiiiek wrote: Of course, this new info about her going out in fourth AGAIN makes me a bit nervous. . . . Is this "info" as in, "Fairplay quits and Mary is voted out second" or "spec" as in, "Parvarti's out early and Jonathan lasts long"? No, the info revealed here, obviously. Well . . . okay, more the possibility than the info. Still, it makes me nervous that Cirie could pull a Yau-Man -- play the best game of everyone but still not make the F3. Yau Man played better than Earl? Bulls*it
Cole		#1723	[-]
Posts: 449 (03/20/08 10:36 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	kdo2 wrote: Cole wrote: jessiiiek wrote: Of course, this new info about her going out in fourth AGAIN makes me a bit nervous. . . . Is this "info" as in, "Fairplay quits and Mary is voted out second" or "spec" as in, "Parvarti's out early and Jonathan lasts long"? No, the info revealed here, obviously. Well . . . okay, more the possibility than the info. Still, it makes me nervous that Cirie could pull a Yau-Man -- play the best game of everyone but still not make the F3. Yau Man played better than Earl? Bullsit. Didn't* he?
AmightyRo		#1724	[-]
Posts: 115 (03/20/08 11:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Cole wrote: kdo2 wrote: Cole wrote: jessiiiek wrote: Of course, this new info about her going out in fourth AGAIN makes me a bit nervous. . . . Is this "info" as in, "Fairplay quits and Mary is voted out second" or "spec" as in, "Parvarti's out early and Jonathan lasts long"? No, the info revealed here, obviously. Well . . . okay, more the possibility than the info. Still, it makes me nervous that Cirie could pull a Yau-Man -- play the best game of everyone but still not make the F3. Yau Man played better than Earl? Bullsit. Didn't* he? He was more likable, but he didn't win...Earl did. Hence, Earl played better. Even though I hated Earl!
Kirblar		#1725	[-]
Posts: 6082 (03/21/08 1:23 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Cole wrote: GrenadeJumper85 wrote: Todd was an awesome winner. He came out on day one, playing and was fun, funny, and great to watch. And smugged it up every moment of the way, which = NOT GREAT. Fuck off and whine over at TWoP if you're gonna bitch about "smugness".
mtj1282		#1726	[-]
Posts: 776 (03/21/08 5:09 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end.
NOV1962		#1727	[-]
Posts: 49 (03/21/08 10:28 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end. But see I don't see a negative edit Cirie has always made off the cuff remarks, the only reason why people are seeing it as a negative now is because she is being shown now as more of a mastermind of the game. Which generally belong to the men of survivor for women on all reality shows you can only be portrayed one way, unlike men......
mtj1282		#1728	[-]
Posts: 785 (03/21/08 12:06 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	WHen I say negative I guess i mean unlikeable. Shes not gettign the nice likeable edit she got last time!
SurvivorFanGP		#1729	[-]
Posts: 5675 (03/21/08 12:15 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end. The point being that you shouldn't assume it's going to be Parvati. You said this time around the 4th placer is going to just miss the win despite playing a great game, and that 4th placer sure as hell won't be Parvati if you go by those guidelines, it'd be Cirie. Regardless, I think it's safe to say Parvati is the only one who's a lock for the F3. Cirie's edit does indeed seem to indicate she either just misses the win or takes it all.
swim4life227		#1730	[-]
Posts: 3024 (03/21/08 1:33 PM) OMEDETO, CATHY!! Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	GrenadeJumper85 wrote: You really are reaching troll level now, good lord. GJ <3 Although he/she/it already reached that last season. It obviously loves Alexis and is going to pull random reasonings out of it's ass so she wins. OoW, do you not realize last season you said Amanda wouldn't win because of her Alexis esque edit but now you are saying Alexis will win for that very reason? Makes zero sense. The push for Cirie's win on Sucks has been somewhat annoying. I say that as a fan of her's also. I think more people are in support of Parvati winning, including myself. I just think Cirie makes final 3 but won't win because her ruthless but fierce gameplay. Last Edited By: swim4life227 03/21/08 1:37 PM. Edited 1 times.
Will		#1731	[-]
Posts: 28432 (03/21/08 1:53 PM) Not a Registered User anymore Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	AmightyRo wrote: Cole wrote: kdo2 wrote: Cole wrote: jessiiiek wrote: Of course, this new info about her going out in fourth AGAIN makes me a bit nervous. . . . Is this "info" as in, "Fairplay quits and Mary is voted out second" or "spec" as in, "Parvarti's out early and Jonathan lasts long"? No, the info revealed here, obviously. Well . . . okay, more the possibility than the info. Still, it makes me nervous that Cirie could pull a Yau-Man -- play the best game of everyone but still not make the F3. Yau Man played better than Earl? Bullsit. Didn't* he? He was more likable, but he didn't win...Earl did. Hence, Earl played better. Even though I hated Earl! So by that standard, Amber played better than everybody on her season?
WylDawg		#1732	[-]
Posts: 14923 (03/21/08 1:54 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	It obviously loves Alexis and is going to pull random reasonings out of it's ass so she wins. OoW, do you not realize last season you said Amanda wouldn't win because of her Alexis esque edit but now you are saying Alexis will win for that very reason? Makes zero sense. The mystery of OoW. I've been brigning that up to him all season long. In fact, Amanda actually had a much better edit than Alexis. Love how he shat on Amanda, but gets a huge boner out of someone who's twice as lame as she was. Not to mention half as hot. Last Edited By: WylDawg 03/21/08 1:57 PM. Edited 1 times.
DevilChild255		#1733	[-]
Posts: 77 (03/21/08 2:19 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	you all do know what Oo's comeback is going to be right? "Edgically" there's no male with an in your face Todd-esque edit so obviously Alexis, the virtually non-existent "sweetheart", is the winner!!!11!!!!! 'Cause, god forbid they portray a female winner with an ounce of intelligence ... it's especially possible this season given the males that are left... I mean, Ozzy's the arrogant "golden boy" who's not really golden anymore, he has the awareness that they'll want him out eventually, yet he's still so damned cocky... then we've got Jason, who's portrayed as a naive idiotic douchebag (seriously, a friggin wooden stick = immunity idol?), James the "gentle giant" who lacks a great social game and is destined to be booted as soon as he loses individual immunity, and Erik, who spends all his time drooling over Ozzy (seriously, those remarks at tribal council about them being "dead" or whatever if it wasn't for Ozzy really irked me, PATHETIC! he's not cut out for Survivor). This season is the perfect opportunity for them to "surprise" us by portraying the female winner as strategic and deserving (one can only hope). Alexis, up till now, does not fit the bill.
Jedijake		#1734	[-]
Posts: 4972 (03/21/08 2:46 PM) MESS member Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Oowantie-Michelle started fire in Fiji and Probst even gave her props for it. You've lost touch with reality and I don't think I or anyone else can give you any support any longer. The support for Alexis is FAR worse than a person changing from one possible winner to another based on reasonable rationale. Any support in Alexis winning (short of an actual spoiler which unfortunately does not exist) is bordering, um, psychotic.
mtj1282		#1735	[-]
Posts: 787 (03/21/08 3:26 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	SurvivorFanGP wrote: mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end. The point being that you shouldn't assume it's going to be Parvati. You said this time around the 4th placer is going to just miss the win despite playing a great game, and that 4th placer sure as hell won't be Parvati if you go by those guidelines, it'd be Cirie. Regardless, I think it's safe to say Parvati is the only one who's a lock for the F3. Cirie's edit does indeed seem to indicate she either just misses the win or takes it all. Its called an opinion you fucking retard. I simply stated my opinion!
mtj1282		#1736	[-]
Posts: 788 (03/21/08 3:29 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Will wrote: AmightyRo wrote: Cole wrote: kdo2 wrote: Cole wrote: jessiiiek wrote: Of course, this new info about her going out in fourth AGAIN makes me a bit nervous. . . . Is this "info" as in, "Fairplay quits and Mary is voted out second" or "spec" as in, "Parvarti's out early and Jonathan lasts long"? No, the info revealed here, obviously. Well . . . okay, more the possibility than the info. Still, it makes me nervous that Cirie could pull a Yau-Man -- play the best game of everyone but still not make the F3. Yau Man played better than Earl? Bullsit. Didn't* he? He was more likable, but he didn't win...Earl did. Hence, Earl played better. Even though I hated Earl! So by that standard, Amber played better than everybody on her season? The goal of the game is to get to the end and secure the majority of votes to win. Earl did that and so did Amber. Therefore they were the best players and played the best game. So yes Amber did play better than everyone on all stars.
SurvivorFanGP		#1737	[-]
Posts: 5688 (03/21/08 5:20 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end. The point being that you shouldn't assume it's going to be Parvati. You said this time around the 4th placer is going to just miss the win despite playing a great game, and that 4th placer sure as hell won't be Parvati if you go by those guidelines, it'd be Cirie. Regardless, I think it's safe to say Parvati is the only one who's a lock for the F3. Cirie's edit does indeed seem to indicate she either just misses the win or takes it all. Its called an opinion you fucking retard. I simply stated my opinion! One that would be taken more seriously if you used proper spelling half the time, douche. Meh, as much as Oo's Alexis schtick is annoying, if any fan is going to win (which at this point doesn't look good), it's going to be her, so I can see where the slight support of Alexis comes from.
CBRetriever		#1738	[-]
Posts: 16380 (03/21/08 5:30 PM) MESS member Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	daym you guys quote a lot
mtj1282		#1739	[-]
Posts: 796 (03/21/08 5:44 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	SurvivorFanGP wrote: mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: mtj1282 wrote: SurvivorFanGP wrote: Natalies edit definitley equals 5th. Fourth place sometimes goes to someone that played a great game but just missed it (yua-man), this season its parvati. "Sometimes" means it can go either way, though. Jenn, Lydia, Sundra, Butch, for example. Cirie is definitley getting the edit of a finalist , but i think if she were the winner she would be getting more of a sweatheart edit so taht the fans that rooted for her last time and are still rooting for her this time will be happy with the outcome along with the rest of the fans. If anything, I think the negative edit is the "doubt" factor that she could win. If she were edited the same way in EI, everyone would be rooting for her and the outcome would be less suspenseful. Parvati is definitely a lock for the F3. It's just a matter of whether Cirie is there too to take the win from her or if she's booted before F3 and Parvati wins. Alexis has no story arc what so ever. Her sole confessional last episode was about freakin' soup, even when Danni got to say something, it was usually related to the game or something endearing. no shit about sometimes means it can go either way. Thats why I said sometimes! I wouldnt have said sometimes if I meant all the time! So whats your point? As far as the doubt factor thing... Cirie being a target for playing a great game last time and being likeable will cause doubt, so a negative edit isnt neccessary. Her being weak also woudl cause doubt because shes not as likely to win crucial immunites at the end. The point being that you shouldn't assume it's going to be Parvati. You said this time around the 4th placer is going to just miss the win despite playing a great game, and that 4th placer sure as hell won't be Parvati if you go by those guidelines, it'd be Cirie. Regardless, I think it's safe to say Parvati is the only one who's a lock for the F3. Cirie's edit does indeed seem to indicate she either just misses the win or takes it all. Its called an opinion you fucking retard. I simply stated my opinion! One that would be taken more seriously if you used proper spelling half the time, douche. Meh, as much as Oo's Alexis schtick is annoying, if any fan is going to win (which at this point doesn't look good), it's going to be her, so I can see where the slight support of Alexis comes from. See your one of the losers with no life outside this board, so you care about what people think. My opinion doesnt need to be taken seriously, cause I could careless what people think. Im better than 99% of sucks posters anyways!
SurvivorFanGP		#1740	[-]
Posts: 5693 (03/21/08 5:48 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	See your one of the losers with no life outside this board, so you care about what people think. My opinion doesnt need to be taken seriously, cause I could careless what people think. Im better than 99% of sucks posters anyways!

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Survivor Fever Bootsheet

Quick Reply