| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 tdugan333 |
|||
|
Posts: 3096 (04/05/08 5:12 AM) |
Just wanted to say that my anti Natalie vitriol has been in full force tonight, but I have to give kudos to Lola for withstanding the onslaught of various
posters and being pretty dang rational about her take on Nat's game play. I too liked her in the beginning, but it's the God shit that she lost me
with.
:sends Lola a candygram |
||
|
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Posts: 3097 (04/05/08 5:13 AM) |
Everything is Eventual wrote: Can you kill it for me EIE? Pretty please with sugar on top?
|
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2409 (04/05/08 5:23 AM) Registered user |
T
I'll try...what the hell is going on with that poster rambling on and on anyway? #1 Rule - please hit fucking enter a few times during your fucking posts if you want any one to read your shit! Otherwise, everyone skims over your rant or rave or whatever. Thanks in advance and also fuck off. |
||
|
blistering |
|||
|
Posts: 1702 (04/05/08 5:26 AM) Registered user |
tdugan333 wrote: I concur. Lola, took a lot of abuse and stood true. I'm glad that should Nat manage to eek out a win, at least you'll be able to enjoy it!
|
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2410 (04/05/08 5:31 AM) Registered user |
I just want an Adam win at this point Blistering.
Unless of course Sharon comes out with guns blazing like she has started to. If Sharon throws this next HOH, then she is a BB officionado. She may be in the best position ever to win the whole game.
Last Edited By: Everything is Eventual
04/05/08 5:39 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 98 (04/05/08 5:37 AM) |
The Marquesan Godfather wrote: Big Red Ecks |
||
|
Fluffynurse |
|||
|
Posts: 13194 (04/05/08 5:38 AM) Registered User |
Everything is Eventual wrote: Yeah, the wall of words is pretty offsetting but the all caps gets me worse. And this poster keeps doing it. You can tell they like the caps lock key
because even their screenname is all caps.
Hey douche, what do we have to do to get it through your bone head that it's offensive to post in all caps? And in regards to the swearing thing, people who believe it's a sin can always "affirm". Most swearing in ceremonies such as in the military or before the court use the terms do you swear or affirm. |
||
|
blistering |
|||
|
Posts: 1704 (04/05/08 5:41 AM) Registered user |
Everything is Eventual wrote:That's what I'm hoping for. If Nat ends up getting him out it would be too horrible for words to describe. |
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 99 (04/05/08 5:43 AM) |
SimplyKimberly wrote: If James goes this week - Sharon would be the target, not Adam, although one of them would have to go up as a pawn, but ultimately, it's a one/one vote, if a tie HOH breaks the tie. The scenarios are endless without knowing who HOH is, Sharon is the only one who could win that would go after Adam directly - and I'd think she'd rather go after Natalie. |
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2412 (04/05/08 5:47 AM) Registered user |
Fluffy - what is your take on this week...
James goes...then who Sharon goes (unlikely) then who Sheila goes (also unlikely) also then who... |
||
|
omzig |
|||
|
Posts: 3741 (04/05/08 5:49 AM) Registered user |
If James goes this week - Sharon would be the target, not Adam, although one of them would have to go up as a pawn, but ultimately, it's a one/one vote, if a tie HOH breaks the tie. The scenarios are endless without knowing who HOH is, Sharon is the only one who could win that would go after Adam directly - and I'd think she'd rather go after Natalie. What worries me is Sheila. She is still upset that Ryan took 10K off a 45 yr old single mother
|
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 100 (04/05/08 5:54 AM) |
SimplyKimberly wrote: you are soooo fucking wrong - IF James leaves this week, both Ryan and Nat will be elated with Adam for getting rid of the unriddable - Sheila and Sharon would go on the block (if neither win HOH).....I'd ony be concerned about Adam if Sheila were to win HOH hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha |
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2414 (04/05/08 6:06 AM) Registered user |
omzig wrote: Ain't happening...Baller is as smart as Sharon, if not *kaching* more intelligent...trust the A-Baller...he knows what he's doing.
|
||
 Nods |
re: | ||
|
Posts: 2265 (04/05/08 6:48 AM) Registered User |
What you really have to worry about is the "numbers" game this week.
James can cut a deal when he is on the block with Sheila and Nat, then they would have a 3-1 advantage over Ryan in the next HOH, then at the final four it would 3-1 against Adam. And don't think for a second that Sheila and Nat wouldn't sell the boys out in a second. I expect producers to point that little fact out soon enough |
||
|
zoomom4 |
|||
|
Posts: 245 (04/05/08 7:38 AM) Registered User |
memyselfandi wrote: X
Last Edited By: zoomom4
04/05/08 7:59 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2425 (04/05/08 7:51 AM) Registered user |
ugh
zoomom come on...would you like all of us to just give you shit? it's lookin' that way. ps. memy - wtf? that is not your usual post style...are you ok?
Last Edited By: Everything is Eventual
04/05/08 7:54 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
zoomom4 |
|||
|
Posts: 246 (04/05/08 8:01 AM) Registered User |
I wasn't looking for trouble...............behind on reading, posted a response to MeMy and didn't realize i left a sentence of someone else's
post right before hers.......................is that what you are talking about?
oh wait, or am i supposed to be all aggressive now, and say 'GET OFF MY CASE BITCH!' jk |
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2428 (04/05/08 8:09 AM) Registered user |
zoomom4 wrote: huh? |
||
|
zoomom4 |
|||
|
Posts: 247 (04/05/08 8:11 AM) Registered User |
okay, apparently i am missing something. I THOUGHT you were going me flack about my screwed up post nesting. What did i do wrong? i am agreeing with Memy, as
several other posters did. Sorry to offend. But she's right.
have to check this out later, running out the door late for an appt. bye all |
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 2429 (04/05/08 8:15 AM) Registered user |
zoomom4 wrote: R U a txtr?
|
||
