| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
puffypinkfattwin |
|||
|
So how's your emotional health?
|
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
puffypinkfattwin wrote: it is UNNECESSARY, causes risk of infection at time, is weeks of pain for the child. Causes an increase in incidence of Penile Cancer. And the most
pressing argument by most advocates seems to be aesthetics.
|
|||
Modesty |
|||
Jakob Speed wrote: Right there is all the argument you ever need against circumcision. |
|||
puffypinkfattwin |
|||
|
Hey Jakob, I'm not saying I don't agree with you. I'm just curious why it's such an issue for YOU.
|
|||
Shorty |
|||
|
Female circumcision and male circumcision aren't really equivalent. Female prevents them from having any sexual stimulation at all. Male circumcision
doesn't. If it did, there would be NO way it would have continued in any culture.
|
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
|
but it is irrelevant in the West for babies. Completely. Why are primarily women, so afraid of a man's right to choose? It is His body, not hers.
Why? |
|||
Dani10 |
|||
Jakob Speed wrote: Again, when the man is looking to put the body part in question INSIDE our body... it becomes our business. |
|||
Modesty |
|||
|
What part of UNNECESSARY and MUTILATION and MAKING YOUR OWN DECISION don't you get, Dani?
|
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
|
puff, I have two sons, two daughters. I was equally opposed to circumcision as I would be any unnecessary surgery.
Hell, a few years ago - the wife talked about getting the oldest girl's ears pierced AT 1 YEAR OLD. I looked at her like she struck her fucking head. There is enough idiocy we are forced to do in life, I plan on limiting what isdone to my own kids. |
|||
Shorty |
|||
|
Oh, I don't disagree. I have three sons and they were all circumcised. When we had it done, everyone just did it. No one was questioning it like they do
now. I've asked them all about it (we're a weird family, we talk about everything. Anyone sitting at our dinnertime discussions would probably freak
lol). They've all said they don't have a problem that we had them circumcised. I suppose when my sons have sons of their own, it'll be something
they'll discuss for themselves. I won't have any opinion one way or the other about it.
|
|||
managerr |
|||
Hell, a few years ago - the wife talked about getting the oldest girl's ears pierced AT 1 YEAR OLD. I looked at her like she struck her fucking head. I thought all girls got their ears pierced at a very young age. Mainly it gets the piercing out of the way when the girls are too young to remember it. (And it's something that can be easily undone if the girl decides they don't want it later on) |
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
Dani10 wrote: As I said a few times in gentler terms, if the boy/man wants to fuck slunts who base their mating rituals of the look of his penis, then so be it. IT IS HIS
DECISION NOT MOMMY DEAREST'S. He can have a circumcision as a teen/adult and take pain drugs that a baby cannot.
|
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
|
When my guys are 12 to 14 or so, I'll give them the options. They want the snip at 14 or so... it is their dealio.
|
|||
Dani10 |
|||
Jakob Speed wrote: Haha - so not liking the way an uncut penis looks makes someone a slut? Riiiight. Good arguement. |
|||
Modesty |
|||
|
*screams*
*runs off to spelling pet peeve thread* |
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
|
if that would be the determinant in dating or not dating that guy, then you would be exceptionally shallow in my not so humble opinion.
I've seen more than a hundred and a quarter vags, and I never once made a determination based on looks of genitals. I've dated some women with labias that could double for Dumbo's ears in a disney movie. |
|||
Dani10 |
|||
|
It's definitely not a determinant to whether or not I date someone. Like I said above, I did date someone who was uncut... for a
while actually. But if I had my choice... I prefer cut.
|
|||
superguppie |
|||
Jakob Speed |
|||
|
:snort
|
|||
Modesty |
|||
|
|
|||