| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
lilnubber |
DERISION 2008 - Three Men and a (Grand)Baby |
Lead | |
|
If only I could chop . . . .
|
|||
ag |
|||
|
jigga wha
|
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
If they were true Republicans, they would all be doing each other in bathroom stalls. "Three Men And A Hole In A Wall"
|
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
Don't we need a synopsis of the last thread first?
Libs suckConservatives are stoopidPalinHolyObamaMcCainNosehairsPalinPalinPregnancyPalin |
|||
lilnubber |
|||
Gregoire wrote:
|
|||
youfist |
|||
|
lol
you libtards musta forgot abot Barney Frank (D) and Gerry Studds (D) Studds was a central figure in the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal, when he and Representative Dan Crane were censured by the House of Representatives for separate sexual relationships with minors - in Studds' case, a 1973 sexual relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page who was of the age of legal consent. The relationship was consensual (which made it legal, in accordance with state law) but presented ethical concerns relating to working relationships with subordinates. During the course of the House Ethics Committee's investigation, Studds publicly acknowledged his homosexuality, a disclosure that, according to a Washington Post article, "apparently was not news to many of his constituents." Studds stated in an address to the House, "It is not a simple task for any of us to meet adequately the obligations of either public or private life, let alone both, but these challenges are made substantially more complex when one is, as I am, both an elected public official and gay." He acknowledged that it had been inappropriate to engage in a relationship with a subordinate, and said his actions represented "a very serious error in judgment."[2] |
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
*Inflammatory Palinpost*
|
|||
Zzunk |
|||
superguppie wrote:Caligula, Part 2 |
|||
StarrEise |
|||
|
This needs to be posted about Sarah Palin. I'm particularly concerned about the censoring of books in the public library.
This was posted in the comments section on the Washington Independent by Alaskan and a Wasillan, Anne Kilkenny, someone who has followed Sarah Palin very, very closely - with too many city council meetings under her belt - not to say her piece. She seems the kind of person that a professional vetting system would have found, and debriefed. We're talking small town politics here as well, so bear that in mind. And I've reproduced only the gist here - go read the original for much more. But after you read this, you begin to realize that there can have been almost no vetting whatsoever:
|
|||
UrbanCenter |
|||
|
With Palin revelations, McCain's gamble is clearer
But now the magnitude of McCain's gamble is becoming clear.
The youthful mother of five whose placement on the ticket was meant to reinforce traditional values has now revealed that her unmarried teenage daughter is pregnant -- a piece of information that the family and the campaign said they had hoped to keep private. The woman introduced to America as a reform-minded Washington outsider who opposed the infamous "bridge to nowhere" -- the symbol of McCain's hatred of wasteful spending -- originally supported its construction. The governor who in her introductory speech decried the practice of budgetary "earmarks" sought, as the state's chief executive and as mayor of Wasilla, hundreds of millions of dollars in such federal funding for local projects.
On Monday, the McCain campaign dispatched lawyers to Alaska in a move described as an attempt to manage a growing crowd of journalists who have traveled there to inspect Palin's background. But the move raises the impression that the McCain campaign didn't know everything about his No. 2 and is now racing to learn what it can while trying to avoid tough questions about the Arizona senator's decision-making process. "I really hope McCain did his homework," said David Frum, a former speechwriter for President Bush. "I cannot stifle a growing sense of unease that he didn't." A former McCain advisor, Mike Murphy, said Monday that it remained an open question whether "the running mate in a good or bad way becomes a window into the skills of the nominee." Most dangerous of all, McCain's team does not seem to know what new development, if any, might grab the public's attention. One Republican strategist with close ties to the campaign described the candidate's closest supporters as "keeping their fingers crossed" in hopes that additional information does not force McCain to revisit the decision. According to this Republican, who would discuss internal campaign strategizing only on condition of anonymity, the McCain team used little more than a Google Internet search as part of a rushed effort to review Palin's potential pitfalls. Just over a week ago, Palin was not on McCain's short list of potential running mates, the Republican said. The unease comes as Palin, 44, prepares for her next big public test: a prime-time, nationally televised speech Wednesday at the Republican National Convention. She will no doubt receive an enthusiastic welcome from delegates and party activists who continued Monday to express unqualified excitement about Palin's presence on the ticket. As a staunch opponent of abortion, even in cases of rape or incest, Palin has invigorated religious conservatives and other members of the GOP base who have been cool to McCain's candidacy and reluctant to work for the campaign with the same verve that fueled President Bush's 2004 reelection. And the speech by Palin is shaping up as a dramatic moment in a convention that has been muted by Hurricane Gustav. Although grass-roots Republicans remain protective of Palin, the campaign has clearly moved from celebratory mode into a full defensive posture. Critics continue to question why McCain, after months of assailing Democratic nominee Barack Obama as lacking foreign policy experience, would tap a running mate who has been governor for less than two years and before that was mayor of Wasilla, population 7,000. McCain's wife, Cindy, told an interviewer over the weekend that Alaska's proximity to Russia bolstered Palin's credentials, and Palin has pointed to her leadership of the Alaska National Guard and her Army son's imminent service in Iraq as evidence of expertise. The campaign has little room for error. A new CBS News poll found that 66% of registered voters were undecided about Palin. And although enthusiastic support from the GOP base is important, strategists know that McCain cannot win without appealing to moderate voters as well -- a bloc that the campaign had hoped Palin's middle-class roots would help win over. "She remains very popular in the convention hall," said Murphy, "but it's the rest of the country that matters."
Another potentially troublesome story line is Palin's past support for federally funded projects that she now claims to have opposed -- a key piece of her reformist image to which McCain was most attracted.
As The Times reported Monday, Palin has requested 31 earmarks in next year's federal budget worth about $197 million. On Friday, she portrayed herself as a champion of curbing the "abuses" of earmark spending. For McCain, the Friday surprise of introducing Palin resulted in a weekend of buzz and anticipation. But if additional surprises surface about Palin, McCain could face stark choices.
And if a new stumbling block could have been discovered by a more careful search, critics will no doubt question a well-known trait of McCain's: that he sometimes makes decisions on emotion instead of careful deliberation. "John McCain is decisive and listens mainly to John McCain," said David Keene, head of the American Conservative Union. "That is either comforting or discomforting, depending on whether you're trying to get him to do what you want."
And this article doesn't mention Palin's own secret shotgun wedding. |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
They call her "Sarah Barracuda" because of her unbridled ambition and predatory ruthlessness. Ooooo, Barracuda!
|
|||
lilnubber |
|||
|
Ha!!!! The "Bridge to Nowhere" earmark didn't exist anymore when Palin was elected in November of 2006.
The earmark was gone as of November 2005. Palin is a Liar |
|||
lilnubber |
|||
the McCain team used little more than a Google Internet search as part of a rushed effort to review Palin's potential pitfalls. OMFG. |
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
Does anyone else feel like they're in the middle of a Christopher Guest movie? |
|||
Zzunk |
|||
|
Please, please, please can I post a bias news article here ??
|
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
|
At long last, nubber finally drops her quixotic quest of seeing Karl Rove in handcuffs. Dinner with a wet merkyl will take place on a boat in soggy Houston. Details to follow.
|
|||
PAPAYOKE |
|||
|
Love me some BARRACUDA.
|
|||
StarrEise |
|||
Zzunk wrote: Please, please, please can you share with me McCain's wisdom of selecting a candidate who had been so poorly vetted? |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
If she withdrawals within the next two weeks, everybody owes me dinner for calling her the Harriet Meirs choice on Friday.
|
|||
TC |
|||
|
wait. is this the new thread? My stones/osmonds analogy is going to lie dormant and die in the old thread? so unfair.
|
|||
PAPAYOKE |
|||
|
I'll treat you to dinner somewhere nice and elitist like The Olive Garden, Greg.
|
|||