BigBrothrFan wrote:Nope. No news on April, Ollie, or Jerry (who may or may not be still alive)
Is there any news on miss April??? She was my favorite. :-) She was fun to watch.
They seem to be hiding or something.... wonder why Lol ;)
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
DAnn Coulter |
|||
BigBrothrFan wrote:Nope. No news on April, Ollie, or Jerry (who may or may not be still alive) They seem to be hiding or something.... wonder why Lol ;) |
|||
I LUV TIJUANA |
|||
BigBrothrFan wrote:Dumbass. |
|||
anders332 |
|||
AeroChild wrote: i never looked at it that way....didn't people who got the feeds get to see it too?? I thought some of it was youtubed..... |
|||
maxxfisher |
|||
susieq wrote:They were trying to hide it from their fellow houseguests, which worked, but the rest of us were cursed with having to see it. |
|||
DAnn Coulter |
|||
|
Memphis is having a chat at Jokers on Wed @ 8pm PST (that's 11pm EST for the retards who don't know time)
I think people from here should go and take over... :D |
|||
AeroChild |
|||
|
No Anders, the feed people didn't get to see it. if I remember right, I think they might have got some bleed through sound, but that was it. Cause there
was a big conspiracy theory that her Dad somehow had CBS NOT show it, which was totally wrong and that incident is how we all found out that they aren't
allowed to show full nude sex on the feeds. If it's under a cover they can.
|
|||
Fluffynurse |
|||
|
Aero, I have to disagree. Chelsea has said in chats that her parents DID blow a gasket at CBS & stirred up lots of shit with the producers.
That's the reason they never had the cameras on them. They told her parents they could not stop them from having sex but they wouldn't show
it. So when the kissing started, even if it didn't lead to sex, the cameras turned away.
|
|||
hollybear141414 |
|||
|
I honestly don't think when C/J did it, they were full out buck naked and wild or anything. I think they were probably under the covers (like April and
Ollie). I don't think they were confident enough that the cameras would definatley be off them. I can see James not caring but I really don't see
Chelsia wanting to do it out in the open with the lights on and no covers. I really think it was really just interference from chelsea's parents like
Fluffy said (which is such BULLSHIT). Not that I wanted to see them fuck or anything, it just got annoying when the cameras would cut away the minute they got
in a room alone together (I remember it being particularly bad during thier HOH week). We probably missed a lot of good game talk because of Chelsia's lame
parents.
Last Edited By: hollybear141414
10/21/08 2:59 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
DAnn Coulter |
|||
|
After two back to back seasons of Cuntsia/James Ollie/Ape sex, that entire house needs to be demolished and rebuilt back up for BB11..
Last Edited By: DAnn Coulter
10/21/08 10:16 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
AeroChild |
|||
|
I know she said that and I don't doubt her parents were livid, but that's not why they didn't show it.
|
|||
ghostbusted |
|||
|
Can you explain why it wasn't shown on the feeds? Since the feeds are restricted to people who voluntarily pay to see them, I thought broadcast standards
for sexual content would not apply. Given all the Internet porn sites, there must not be anything regulating the Internet itself.
|
|||
Fluffynurse |
|||
|
That's the reason why I believe Chelsea's parents had everything to do with the sex not being shown on the feeds. Not because CBS
couldn't. It was because CBS wouldn't.
And Chelsea's parents had good reason to be on CBS's ass. The entire premise of the couple setup got things off to a strange start. The HGs were told they HAD to sleep with their assigned partners. It would have been different if they were allowed to hook up independently. Plus, James' history of unprotected gay sex probably had a great deal to do with it too. CBS knew they were playing with fire. |
|||
hollybear141414 |
|||
|
psh, if you sign up for Big Brother you should just expect STDs to be involved. it's their own fault.
|
|||
Dharmit |
|||
hollybear141414 wrote:I remember many moments.. HOH bathtub for one, where Chels got totally naked and down on it just before the feed cameras cut to something else. They did indeed get full out buck naked and wild on more then one occassion and we only saw the start before production cut away. CBS did not want the full nudity and sex on the feeds. We can only speculate as to why.. but I agree it had a lot to do with Chelsia's parents. |
|||
diewinelle |
|||
|
sigh.....
i've never believed her parents kept this off the feeds. chelsia is an adult. she's not a child and she signed her own contract---they didn't. i doubt if ollie's parents were too thrilled he was fucking the town whore either, but i simply don't believe anyone's parents could influence the network to keep that content off the feeds. if they'd called and complained, we still would have seen it, because except for the covers slipping, they were covered up. chelsia's parents could yell, threaten and bitch all they wanted. there was still nothing they could do about any of it. if chelsia didn't insist on using protection, that's HER problem, no matter who she was cast with. nobody had a gun to her head and forced her to have sex. that's a decision she made and as a grown up, she has a right to make it. there's not a damn thing legally her parents could have done about it either. i think production made a decision not to show full on, naked, out in the open sex, even on the feeds. simple as that. |
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
hi die! i totally agree.
|
|||
DAnn Coulter |
|||
|
I agree with Die's assesement...... I think production made the decision to not show nudity/sex because they fear the religious nutaceses who complain all
the time about everything "indecent" shown on tv, etc
now lets move on from the shit that was BB8 & BB9...... Memphis is having a chat at everyone's favorite site jokersupdates tonight @ 8pm pst |
|||
hollybear141414 |
|||
diewinelle wrote: okay but how do you explain the fact that the feeds cut from them when they'd only start smooching a little?? |
|||
diewinelle |
|||
hollybear141414 wrote:i never saw that. maybe the clothes started coming off as soon as they started making out? and shit, maybe i'm totally wrong and it WAS because of her parents. i just find that hard to believe because they couldn't have done anything about it legally and i can't see the network bowing to any pressure from them unless they'd had grounds to sue. |
|||
Dharmit |
|||
|
Oh I agree as well that CBS is never going to show full on sex happening. They didn't have any problem with the nudity on the feeds though.
|
|||