There has to be a moral somewhere in this story, but i can't find it

| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
VillageIdiot |
Isn't it ironic that... |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 1101 (11/30/08 03:28 PM) Registered user |
... a multi-billionnaire who lived in the 1850's actually had a MUCH MUCH suckier lifestyle than a middle class dude living now in the 2000's? No
flying, no Internet, no Seinfeld, no Super Mario Kart, no playboy, and even no OT.
There has to be a moral somewhere in this story, but i can't find it |
||
NakedWench |
|||
|
One man's treasure is another man's trash?
|
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
they didn't think it sucked and they had servants and live ins. they probably were very social and had dinner parties and attended gatherings and spoke to
others in person and read books.
|
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
|
Not ironic.
|
|||
Casey333 |
|||
|
People in the year 2200 will be saying the same thing about us.
|
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
in the year twentyfive
twentyfive if man is still alive if woman can survive they may find. in the year thirtyfive thirtyfive ain't gonna need to tell the truth tell no lies everything you think do and say is in the pill you took today. |
|||
pussycow |
|||
VillageIdiot wrote: Is this from the extended version of Ironic? |
|||
GregBuisIsADick |
|||
|
1) There were no multi-billionaires in the 1850s.
2) Even if there were, this would not be an example of irony. |
|||
squashthebeef |
|||
|
The multi-billionaire got more tail. Way more tail.
WHOSE LIFESTYLE IS SUCKIER NOW?!?!? |
|||