Kitty Pryde1 wrote:
BEST
BJ/Tyler
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dan Down Under |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
What? Normally we have bland vanilla winners. BJ/Tyler, along with Flo, are the only real winners that were even remotely interesting. I'd rather have a
team that hogs the camera and tries to make good TV than some of these bland teams that go far.
|
|||
Dan Down Under |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: But...but...TTOW! *shudders* I mean, I'm sure they're great guys and I was happyish when they beat Gayric/Fatcunteremy, but their camera whoring rubbed me in a very very wrong way. Flo on the other hand <33333! Keeping it real that crazy bitch. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
Dan Down Under wrote: Teams that are interesting without trying are great. The problem is that these teams never win. Teams that win are typically bland (although this season's final 3 have a surprising amount of personality), which means any time, no matter how big of camera whores they are, that can win the race, is awesome. |
|||
Dan Down Under |
|||
|
^
True that. Or major assholes. See: marriedalphagays. |
|||
izad |
|||
|
i'm pretty certain kitty would enjoy watching TARA2 ssts
|
|||
Dan Down Under |
|||
izad wrote:omg Izad, don't even speak of them. If there was a TAR God, then they were conjured by the TAR devil. Worst. Team. Ever. DISGUSTING. |
|||
A Dying Clown |
|||
|
If I could somehow edit out all the times they screamed "PIZZA PIE!" and other terrible European stereotypes in the mid-season, BJ/Tyler would be my
favourite winners.
For all the flack both teams get around here, it was their Yield drama and Eric/Jeremy's cab cancelling that caused almost all the entertainment in the second half of the season (that and Mojo's lol-tastic epic fail elimination), which is more than can be said for all the other winners except Chip/Kim (yielding Colin/Christie), Flo/Zach and Eric/Danielle, which is why they're my favos, regardless of their likeability. i'm pretty certain kitty would enjoy watching TARA2 sstsNo-one enjoys watching TARA2 |
|||
arcuid |
|||
Dan Down Under wrote: I get hives just thinking of those two twats. |
|||
Utopian |
|||
|
Either the lovely, vivacious Starr and her brother are the best racers ever (as evidenced by the number of their first place finishes, often with the second
place team not even close), or this is the worst field of contestants ever.
|
|||
A Dying Clown |
|||
this is the worst field of contestants ever.Dandrew made Final 3, I rest my case. Ken/Tina's average finish is 2.7 and Nick/Starr's is 2.6, so both teams are fairly even. |
|||
Cole |
|||
|
I hardly think they'd be the worst winners ever. No one will ever take that title from Eric & Danielle, IMO. But they'll certainly be the most
predictable ones.
|
|||
Cole |
|||
Dan Down Under wrote: No, they won't be the best. They've lucked out on weaker competition, plain and simple. It'd be interesting to see how they'd have fared in a season with smarter, more competitive teams. And I'll hazard a guess and say not that well. |
|||
Screerider |
|||
|
It doesn't matter what happens next week.
Uchenna and Joyce: Worst.Winners.Ever and Lowest.Scum.of.the.Earth. |
|||
Nimberlane |
|||
Screerider wrote:What the fuck? Where did this come from? |
|||
3Diesel |
|||
maldoror122 wrote:X |
|||
A Dying Clown |
|||
ell, Nick and Starr >>>>> Tk and Rachel.Yes, but Stalin and Lenin >>>>> Tk and Rachel |
|||
Screerider |
|||
What the fuck? Where did this come from?There're like a bizzillion threads on it. Yet, Search only brought me these two: Fateful Ticket Printer Condemns Uchenna & Joyce uchenna and joyce bitching thread for screerider One ancient thread had this spreadsheet in it:
I forget what analogy it was deconstructing. |
|||
7Sages |
|||
|
They definitely won't be the worst winners ever
|
|||
fainting goat |
|||
|
Not the worst, but one of the blandest.
|
|||