Yuku free message boards

Players started with from Episode 1:
+10: Brendan
+5: Sandy, Taj, Erin
-5: Sierra
-10: Spencer and Sydney

Episode 2
Round 1
Taj Steven Syndey - all minus 5
Sierra Candace Tyson - all plus 5
Round 2
JT Joe Sandy - all minus 5
Erin Brendan Tyson - all plus 5
Round 3
Candace Sierra Erin - all minus 5
Taj Sydney Sandy - all plus 5
Round 4
JT Joe Spencer - all plus 5
Brenden Coach Jerry - all minus 5
Round 5
Steven Sydney Taj - all plus 5
Sierra Candace Tyson - all minus 5

Totals:
Brendan + 10
Taj + 10
Erin + 5
Tyson + 5
Steven - 0
JT - 0
Joe - 0
Debbie - *
Carolina - 0
Coach - 5
Jerry - 5
Candace -5
Sandy - 5
Spencer - 5
Sydney - 5
Sierra - 10

Most deserving to be safe: Brendan, Taj, Erin, Tyson, Steven, JT, Joe
Most deserving to be vulnerable: Sierra, Spencer, Sydney, Sandy, Candace, Jerry, Coach

Actually safe: Joe, JT, Sandy, Spencer (F), Steven, Syndey (F), Taj
Actually vulnerable: Candace, Brendan (F), Coach, Debbie, Erin (F), Jerry, Sierra, Tyson (F)

Voted out: Candace

Results:

Survivor S18E02 gets 5 F's:
Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck

Mikester wrote:

---

Wow Artiee, I agree with you. Candace's boot was bullshit.

Candace lost two rounds. Negative 5 overall. She deserved to be vulnerable, and the only person who did worse was Sierra.

But Sierra managed to beat her at the social game.

The problem with the current system, as always, is not when you disagree with the votes

It's that players like Spencer and Sydney, who are just as bad as Candace, are kept safe because they are on a stronger team. And now I am documenting this every episode so morons can't even try to refute it.

Mikester wrote:

---

Oh I thought you just wanted the weakest person booted each week.

My system finds the weakest half, makes them vulnerable as they deserve, and then out of those losers, the weakest gets voted off. Making that person the weakest, every single time.

This thread determines the weakest half in the current system, and proves when they are not vulnerable as they deserve, as well as when the strongest half are vulnerable. So while the system failed again this week, the one voted out deserved to be vulnerable. The unfair part, the flaw of the current system, and why the game fails, is that Spencer and Sydney, equally as weak as Candace, were not vulnerable this episode.

Mikester wrote:

---

But doesn't individual performance in each challenge factor in as well? Because technically you're giving points to Sierra who, for most of the rounds, was stuck underneath someone and didn't do much at all. Whereas, Candace lost her round but was shown putting the most effort into the actual challenge (jumping on Taj, throwing Sydney down.)

My system is about individual performance, the current system unfortunately doesn't test that until the merge (which is why it fails). The way they edit it is not only irrelevant, but misleading.
Either way, Candace and her side failed twice to get the Win, including the last and most important round.