3. Linda/Karen
2. Danny/Oswald
1. Ronald/Christina
Same top 3 as last time I think.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Annoying Tool Fanboy |
|||
|
4. Paolos
3. Linda/Karen 2. Danny/Oswald 1. Ronald/Christina Same top 3 as last time I think. |
|||
zzzazzzazzz |
|||
|
|
|||
Spanky Hot Dog |
|||
A Dying Clown wrote: X I got both of the teams right though <333 |
|||
Will |
|||
Genesis wrote:Unfournately it happens in all these types of polls. It's one thing to give a one to somebody you don't like, it's another to give somebody a 1 because you know somebody's giving them a 10. |
|||
A Dying Clown |
|||
It's one thing to give a one to somebody you don't like, it's another to give somebody a 1 because you know somebody's giving them a 10.And that wouldn't be necessary if there weren't people giving 99% of the teams a '1' just to boost a couple of teams they're obsessed with. It'd be interesting to compare these results with a poll compiled with everyone just listing their 10 favourites and 10 least favourites |
|||
PAOLOWNAGE |
|||
|
PAOLO'S IN THE TOP 4 <3333
� �� |
|||
JasonSiskaLulz |
|||
Will wrote:
|
|||
zzzazzzazzz |
|||
|
No wonder why these results are so skewed. I wonder if we should just out right post or pm our rankings, maybe it'll discourage people from doing that.
|
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
This is the exact same final 4 as last season, only with Paolos instead of some other team (I think it was Momily).
|
|||
Will |
|||
JasonSiskaLulz wrote:I gave people 1s because I DIDN'T LIKE THEM or I had no idea who they were. There's no strategical voting involved. |
|||
JasonSiskaLulz |
|||
|
so you either ABSOLUTELY LOVED or ABSOLUTELY LOATHED everyone? k
|
|||
Penthesilea |
|||
A Dying Clown wrote: |
|||
dissimilis |
|||
|
TAR2 Danny & Oswald deserve to be in the top 3 every single time this thing comes around, but I don't think the All-Stars version was anywhere near
close to their former selves...they were good, but certainly not top 10 good, or even top 20 good.
I'm surprised so many people enjoyed them as much as they did the second time around, I was definitely rooting for them but I was let down that they didn't have the same sense of fun. |
|||
Chiaroscuro |
|||
|
I actually liked the fact that they came back more competitive. Sometimes they didn't seem to care enough in TAR 2. They had some unhappy moments in TAR:
All Stars but most of the time they were just incredible. I started off TAR 11 thinking they didn't deserve to be on all stars but when they did so well
and gave such great soundbites they became my favorite team. I loved when Oswald chased Phil around at the mat after the coal task!
|
|||
bubbybear |
|||
|
I love it when a really nice team has a spat once in a while, like the BQ's and Bowling Moms. It's a reminder that they're still human, and not
Stepford bots like Kris/Jon.
|
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
A Dying Clown wrote: No, not really. Yes they were a part of the few major shifts in position in the legs; however that is more of a testament to how shitty the race course was, not how great Mike/Mel were. Additionally, I was fine with them getting sixth; we got enough to see their personalities but not so much that they became boring (Tammy/Victor). Besides, they wouldn't have called Luke a bitch to his face, right? |
|||
Will |
|||
JasonSiskaLulz wrote: I loved a few people, I hated a lot. I didn't know wtf the rest were. Thus a lot of ones. |
|||
bryanpasa |
|||
Chiaroscuro wrote: |
|||
ImANewUser |
|||
|
Both Oswald & Dannys in Top 5 <3<3<3<3
Bowling Moms & Paolos in Top 4 <3<3<3<3 Any of the four left winning would be great. I'm actually somewhat optimistic about the ending. I gave all four 10s, so it's all good for me. |
|||
Spanky Hot Dog |
|||
|
I hope Ron/Chris somehow lose. <3
|
|||