Yuku free message boards

hagiz1 wrote:

---

Bowie wrote:

---

You guys seriously have some double standards here. We're having arguments about the likelihood or practicality of certain things, which I think we can all admit are fairly pointless, but I'm never the first one to make it personal like "gee you say some dumb shit" or whatever. If you disagree, fine, and I appreciate your reasons why, but there's no reason to criticise the fact that I take the opposing argument. Secondly, it's not my intention to make it seem like I think my ideas are top shit or whatever. The two threads that I started were QUESTIONS asking for your opinions, it's not like i'm MattyP starting one of his many "Survivor 20 will be Heroes vs Villains" threads. I'm just here to discuss and speculate on Survivor like you guys, so no need to rally up each other. Thirdly, I don't mind if you do, because I don't take it personally -- and I will continue to be who I am and discuss things that I truly believe possible or probable or good or bad or whatever. Fourthly, I've made it pretty clear that the two shades of blue wouldn't be for 8 episodes or something -- just one or two max, kind of like Exile Islands' four tribes were subsumed into two in EPISODE 2. It's like the fake snow thing. It's just a question of whether you think it's a big deal, and my overall argument is that in Survivor's 19th season, little issues like this are NOT a big deal, and imho are more possible than you think. Fair enough. You disagree with me. But there's no point calling what I say dumb shit when it's speculation anyway, and when you know I'm going to continue regardless.

And I'm only pointing out that you cried "foulplay" for us calling your ideas are dumb. (which they are btw)

And I'm just saying that in sucks, you either be tough or beat it. No point of you crying "Why are flaming me? I'm only asking Questions. I'm not like MattyP."

Noone cares.

matty p wrote:

---

Bowie wrote:

---

it's not like i'm MattyP starting one of his many "Survivor 20 will be Heroes vs Villains" threads.

Umm, I've started 1 thread, which was 4 months ago. Why did you even drag me into this? Poor form from a fellow Aussie.

hagiz1 wrote:

---

Who the hell takes it personally?

Are you delirious? You're the one who's being personal and you even took MattyP into this thread and saying shit about him. And you're the one who personally always using your bad "sarcasm" to taunt people. Like "Americans are stupid, they can't differentiate dark blue and light blue" or "Is that all you can do?"
You think it was smart. I can tell you, no it wasn't.



I never once said bad things about you personally. I said your ideas are dumb, yes. But never you personally. I think you don't have any comprehension of what's personal and what's not.

So you think when somebody is saying that your idea is shit, then that person is attacking you personally? WHAT ARE YOU? a kindergarten kid?

It is apparent that you're probably a high school kids coz honestly if you're in a University, you'd learn about matter of opinion and when it's personal and when it's only saying your ideas are bad. If I said that you're fugly ass whose IQ is lower than an idiot, then that would be called personal. Have I done that? No.


I even encouraged you to toughen up in this forum, coz you're a n00b and obviously if you cried and say "You're taking this personally" whenever somebody's saying that your ideas are bad, then you're in the wrong forum buddy.


But as I said, you're entitled of your opinion and so do I.
The thing is that you kept saying that "it's just my opinion", so why the hell are you trying to shut me? I'm entitled to have my opinion and it's my opinion that your idea is stupid like shit.

End of story.


You're the one who can't even defend your stupid idea. I never once heard you say anything to contradict my points. I told you about why your ideas are bad. All you can say is "bla bla, Why you all ganging up on me? I'm not like MattyP. bla bla"
You never once said, "No I think you're wrong, I think that dark blue and light blue will still be dark blue and light blue whenever it gets water."

The point is that you can't defend your shitty idea. That's it. end of story. If you think you can defend them, I'd like to hear you disapprove my 4 points of why they never will never have 2 shades of blue in the show.


It's nothing personal, mate. It's the matter of ideas and who's smart enough to defend them which you clearly can't.

hagiz1 wrote:

---

LOL. of course I'm upset coz you're accusing me attacking you personally. Which I never did.

Who wouldn't be upset if you're accused of doing something that you never did?

Anyway, I've said my piece. You can laugh all you want but I'm going to be the bigger man and walk away.