Buccaneer wrote:
kenc333 wrote:
I love Sandra, and think she's the most entertaining winner of all-time, but Kitty's probably right in that she's not the kind of player that would consistently go far based on skills, physical abilities and personality. If you're to say that Sandra could find a way out of being eliminated, I'm sure all of the winners could do that... Amber had a hand in having Jerri voted out before her in the most unbalanced tribe swap ever, Danni got Judd, etc thrown out before her, Bob saved himself through Sugar when Randy went... I think the question has to be, what can Sandra do that no other winner is capable of?
If I were to choose the winners who would consistently go far, my top 3 would probably be Danni, Earl and Parvati.
Nope you are wrong. People assume that because she is entertaining she must not be a good player also but the fact is she is both! In fact people underestimating her is why she will do well each time! You do not have to be a boring gamebot like the alpha male clones to be a good player. You say that all the winners could find a way out of being eliminated but at least 3 former winners on all stars did not. They could not figure out how to take the targets off their backs enough to survive. So why is Sandra the worst? omg because she is entertaining so she must not be a good player!1!!! Wrong! She is just that good! Even if we say all the winners could get out of those situations though you have made my point. You want to know what Sandra can do that no other winner is capable of? There is an endless list of first time accomplishments by her. She can mouth off to players, stab them in the back, toss out their fish, kick sand into their faces, not win challenges, and she completely gets away with it and almost win unanimously at the end without ever getting voted for.
I think she's a good player, but not one who would go far 9 out of 10 times.
On All-Stars, Tina, Rich and Ethan got voted out because they had a previous reputation (Tina was specifically targetted for being a winner), so given the premise of this thread, that example wouldn't apply to your argument.
I get that you're a huge fan of hers and think she's the greatest thing to happen to Survivor, but I don't think you can honestly say that someone like Sandra is more likely to go further in multiple seasons (with no previous reputations) than someone like Danni. And she won 6-1 because the jury didn't wanna reward an outcast with the win and because Lill had to fight the burden of being labelled as the Scout master.









