Kitty Pryde1 wrote:I already know we are talking about 100 normal seasons but we can still judge player abilities. I saw a bunch of winners who were lucky enough to never get targeted in their original games completely fall apart once they became targets in All Stars. Sandra was a target at different points of Pearl Islands and she zigged and zagged her way to the end as a true good player should do.
It's different because in All-Stars, outside reputations affected how people voted. There's a reason why, in the final 7 players of the season, only one person had made it to the final 4 before. It's because the players who performed poorly teamed up and eliminated those who went far on the basis that they were threats for their past reputations. Tina was targetted solely because of her past reputation, not because of her challenge prowess. Richard was targetted solely due to past reputation. Rob C. was targetted due to past repuation. Colby, Lex, Kathy, all the same deal. All-Stars is not a legitimate season for judging player abilities, because it had a set of circumstances that would never occur, even in 100 normal seasons.









